“highly significant”

The resulting LV was highly significant ( p < .0001, all conditions contributing, Fig. 4 B, see Table S6 for all relevant brain regions and their MNI coordinates).

Data mining – untargeted correlations There were a number of unpredicted and highly significant ( p < 10 −4 ) correlations between Biodex measures of muscle strength and intramuscular pH.

culicifacies was lowest in plain villages as compared to dam, forest and foothill villages and this difference was highly significant (p<0.0001).

As the unstressed yeasts, all tested compounds-treated yeast cells showed a highly significant higher growth rate (r = 0.3056 ± 0.0063 h −1 ; F ( 22,46 ) = 31.43; p < 0.0001).

Both models were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with adjusted coefficients of determination (R 2 adj ) between 0.72 and 0.78.

A generalized additive model (GAM) fitted to the normalized data revealed strong non-linear temporal structure in activity under all light treatments, with highly significant treatment-specific smooths of time (all F > 380, all p < 0.0001), explaining 97.6% of the variance in normalised activity (adjusted R 2 = 0.97).

Conversely, as found for bottlenose dolphins ( Williams et al., 2017b ), there were highly significant relationships between V̇ O 2 ss (J kg −1 min −1 ) and f S (strokes min −1 ) ( n =30 swims, d.f.=1, 28, F =25.53, P <0.0001, AICc=304.28, BIC=308.29; Fig. 4A ) for beluga whales, where: (1) and between V̇ O 2 ss (J kg −1 min −1 ) and swim speed ( U swim , m s −1 ) ( n= 30 swims, d.f.=1, 28, F =54.93, P <0.0001, AICc=288.48, BIC=291.76; Fig. 4B ), where: (2) even within the relatively narrow range of exercise efforts representing the preferred performance levels of the individual whales.

4 a) showed a highly significant interaction between culture medium and initial inoculum concentration ( p < 0.0001), indicating that the effect of inoculum depended on the culture medium.

The regression indicated, using the Nagelkerke pseudo-R 2 , that 22% of the variance in HCW abuse was accounted for by these two predictor variables, with externally assessed gender role being highly significant (p < 0.0001) and being exposed or identifying as an MSM to the HCW not significant as a predictor (p = 0.38).

58 Our results revealed that the TT genotype and the T allele distribution were dominant in the HCC group rather than the CT and CC genotypes in the control group, with a highly significant difference between the two groups, P = 0.0001.

basilicum , a highly significant elongation in the larval duration ( F = 25.63; df = 3, 378; P < 0.0001) was recorded.

WT T cell speeds, we find a 5% reduction in cell speed, yet the result is highly significant with p<0.0001; and a 1.8% increase in migration angle, with p = 0.0144.

When comparing allelic frequencies between HIV-controllers and the PRIMO seroconverters, four SNPs located within the 6p21 (rs2395029, rs13199524, rs12198173 and rs3093662, are in bold in Table 1 ), showed highly significant differences (p<10 −4 ) that correspond to a striking enrichment in HIV-controllers for protective allelic variants associated with HIV-RNA levels.

Specific leaf area Specific leaf area was 8.9% lower for red oak than bur oak on average, and this difference was highly significant ( F 1, 2191 = 83.85, P ≤ 0.0001, Fig. 2 d).

3) provided a highly significant improvement in fit in both male and female subjects ( P < 0.0001).

Marker Mvis020 showed a large and highly significant ( P < 0.0001) deficit of heterozygous genotypes.

Significance analysis of regression coefficients reveals the linear term A (trehalose) is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), B (lactose) is significant ( p < 0.05), and C (skim milk powder) is highly significant ( p < 0.01).

brevis CD2 treatment resulted in a highly significant reduction in BoP score compared to baseline ( p < 0.0001 ).

The enrichment of the identified proteins with oxidoreductase activity or involvement in cell redox homeostasis as determined using the ProfCom database was statistically highly significant (p<0.0001).

One sided p-value to kappa showed a highly significant correlation between two evaluations of the same observer (p <0.0001).

In addition, a highly significant association ( p <0.0001) was observed between weight gain and the number of cigarette-free days.

Differences in VSRQ scores across clinical severity groups were highly significant (p < 0.0001).

In contrast, mT alone had no significant effect on shoot regeneration rate (p = 0.89) or shoot number (p = 0.71), but showed a highly significant effect on the variables longest shoot length (p < 0.0001) and rhizogenesis percentage (p < 0.0001).

The difference in the two-sample test was highly significant ( P = 0.0001).

Only 10 of 68 species were found on both sides of this divide, and ANOSIM showed that this grouping was highly significant (ANOSIM; R = 0.97, p = 0.0001), with the shallower features more similar to each other (ANOSIM; R = 0.43, p = 0.01) than the deeper features were (ANOSIM; R = 0.87, p = 0.1).