“highly significant”

The log-rank statistic which formally tests whether the Survival Curves for each group overlap was highly significant (χ 2 = 32.26 for >LLOQ and 29.99 for >200, p < 0.0001).

6 ) is highly significant (t-test, P<0.0001) ( Fig. 7 ).

The difference in SARS-CoV-2 prevalence as shown in high- and low- or middle-income countries was highly significant (5.1% [1634/32,053] vs 21.6% [11,521/53,221], P<.0001).

A highly significant difference in the journal impact factor ( p < 0.0001) was observed between manuscripts associated with OC (8.3 ± 10.1) and PP (4.0 ± 2.3).

Decrease in Circulating mDCPs and pDCPs in PAD In patients with PAD, a highly significant decrease in the relative numbers of circulating mDCPs (0.15 versus 0.2; P < 0.0001), pDCPs (0.09 versus 0.12; P = 0.01), and tDCPs (0.25 versus 0.36; P < 0.0001) was observed compared to the controls ( Figure 2 ).

Such a mechanism is further suggested by the highly significant regressions (p<0.0001) between log(pCO 2 ) and the estimated contribution of carbonate weathering to TA (R 2 = 0.38), or with Si/Ca 2+ ratios (R 2 = 0.35), i.e.,rock weathering would explain close to 35% of the variance of pCO 2 .

ALDH1 expression showed a significant association with high-grade tumor budding, with the result being statistically highly significant (p = 0.0001).

ANOSIM analysis confirmed a highly significant difference among the four microbial community structures ( R = 0.81; P = 0.0001) and the performed test showed significant differences in the pairwise comparisons of the sites with R values approaching 1 in most of the cases ( Table 3 ).

The mortality was not significantly different between patients with and without complications ( P = 0.52), while there was a highly significant difference in LOS between subjects with and without complications (median, 6 versus 18 days, respectively, P < 0.0001).

Both terms were again highly significant ( p < 0.0001 for both), but together only explained 13% of the variation in AAA.

There was a highly significant effect of basking position on the maximum body temperature reached ( F 2,86 = 998.8, P <0.0001) the greatest temperatures being reached with the most open wings ( Fig 3 ).

28 , 29 , 31 ICIs-related VTE occurrence was not independently associated with shorter PFS (HR 1.82, 95% CI 0.93-3.55, P = .08) ( Figure 3A ), and highly significant heterogeneity was shown between studies (Cochran's Q statistic, P < .0001, I 2 = 89%).

Worsening was highly significant when compared to basal values (BV; p < 0.0001 vs.

When patient antibodies were correlated to the JADI-A scores, we found a highly significant association to the number of antibodies detected (p = 0.0001).

Results ANOVA showed a highly significant influence of time both on tryptophan and on serotonin, in all horses, on either day, with p values < 0.0001.

This regression was highly significant (standardized beta = 0.49 ± 0.002, t = 35.25, P < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.34; linear regression).

2 b); renal expression of NGAL was increased in CLP (48 h) animals compared to sham and stain intensity analysis across groups shows highly significant differences (CLP vs. sham 9.5 ± 3.4 vs. 3.5 ± 2.5, P < 0.0001; Fig. 2 c, d).

In all cases, the differences between phenotype classes were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

The values obtained are highly significant (P < 0.0001).

Line was highly significant for all field environments ( P < 0.0001 ) and greenhouse incubation period ( P = 0.0464), but not for the greenhouse DLA measurements ( P = 0.2187) (Table 1 ).

Nevertheless, the highly significant difference between diaphragm and blood host-origin levels (~ 47% versus ~ 13%, respectively; P < 0.0001) in the shielded mice implicates monocyte-independent macrophages as a major contributor to the normal tissue-resident macrophage population of the diaphragm.

A comparative analysis indicated a highly significant difference in allele frequency distribution between Kuwaitis and Africans ( p < 0.0001), Americans ( p < 0.0001), Ashkenazi Jews ( p = 0.001), East Asians ( p < 0.0001), and Finns ( p < 0.0001).

Mean ODI score improved from 82.32% preoperatively to 19.17% at final follow-up, a highly significant improvement ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 6 ).

Highly significant ( P < 0.0001) differences in susceptibilities to the disease were detected among the evaluated germplasm.

Trichomalus perfectus Parasitism Rate A highly significant but low negative correlation between T. perfectus parasitism rate and CSW infestation rate was observed ( Kendall’s Tau = 0.29, z = 4.31, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 5 ).