“highly significant”

Gel and capillary electrophoresis correlate well for estimating the concentration of the five serum protein fractions When the serum total protein concentration was entered into Phoresis software and then used to calculate the individual protein fractions, we obtained a highly significant (p < 0.0001) correlation between the gel and capillary electrophoresis values.

The frequency of dicentrics showed a highly significant difference ( P < 0.0001) in Group I, Group II, and Group III compared to Group IV.

The aspirin pH i recovery rate showed a highly significant difference in ΔpH/min compared to non-stimulated conditions, ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2A ).

Otherwise, our shuffled genes would not show the highly significant statistical association in amino-acid divergence K a we observe between sequence domain pairs (Figure 5 ; Pearson's r 0.47, Spearman's s 0.45, P < 0.0001 for both).

Statistical analysis using Mann Whitney test showed that the differences between control and treated groups were highly significant with P value <0.0001 in all cases ( Figure 6 ).

The difference between the two distributions is highly significant (t > 58, permutation derived P value < 0.0001).

Chi-squared tests demonstrated that all differences between the observed overlap, and the overlap expected by chance were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

The difference in survival expectance between patients with high-risk score and low-risk score was highly significant (p<0.0001).

The statistical analyses show that quadratic models fit very well into the data for the response and the responses were highly significant (p < 0.0001).

The analysis of variance of the response surface quadratic regression model showed that the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with a high F-value of 32.31.

Normality and Distributional Diagnostics Every impedance trait produced highly significant p -values ( p < 0.0001), rejecting the null hypothesis of equivalence.

Effects of the Experimental Conditions on Salivary Cortisol The two-factor (Time x Group) between-design repeated ANOVA showed a significant interaction effect of Time x Group, F (2.07, 57.96) = 8.28, p = 0.001, and a main effect of Time, F (2.07, 57.96) = 8.82, p<0.0001, and, as expected, a highly significant effect of Group, F (1, 28) = 91.08, p<0.0001.

Results at this level alone were highly significant (F-ratio 10.88 and 9.79 P < 0.0001).

This difference was highly significant ( Table 6 ) for both severe (p<0.0001) and less-severe (p<0.0001) complication groups.

The average hyphal areas in the zep-A2 and zep-B1 mutants were approximately 50% of those in the WT, and these differences were highly significant (Student’s t -test, P < 0.0001) ( Figure 2 G).

The results are statistically highly significant WOMAC osteoarthritis index at V1: (4.24 ± 1.94/6.19 ± 1.79; p < 0.0001, t test and Wilcoxon test), not significant at V2: p = 0.1636, highly significant at V3: p = 0.0009, and significant at V4: p = 0.0123 (Fig. 4 ).

The consistent differences between males of different ecotypes, with stream males generally scoring higher on PC1, remained highly significant (F = 25.9093, P<0.0001, df = 1, 110).

Mean explained variance across subjects peaked 156 ms after stimulus onset ( r 2 = 0.65, mean p < 0.0001, Bonferroni-corrected; Figure 6A ); peak values for individual subjects ranged between r 2 = 0.49–0.85 at 144–168 ms after stimulus-onset and were all highly significant (all p < 0.0001).

One-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of the nanohybrid loading on TPC (F(3,8) = 784.5, p < 0.0001).

All 28 possible lane/read pair combinations produced highly significant P -values based on 10 000 Monte Carlo iterations ( P <0.0001; Bonferroni-adjusted α 0.01 =0.0004).

We found highly significant positive correlations between the identity levels of allergens and the representative helminth (r = 0.70, P<0.0001), protozoan (r = 0.64, P<0.0001) and fungal (r = 0.47, P = 0.0011) organisms suggesting that a conserved protein allergen in HPF is also conserved to a similar level in human.

From a quantitative standpoint, the ANOVA test showed a highly significant difference among groups for the overall scores (F = 19.14, p < 0.0001).

7 A), a remarkable and highly significant increase in NfL levels was observed in the PTX group ( P < 0.0001) and this increase persisted after 2 weeks of follow-up (Fig. 7 B) and until the end of the follow-up period (Fig. 7 C) ( P < 0.0001 and P < 0.05, respectively). 3.7.2.

This was highly significant (Fishers exact test, P = 0.0001) (Table I).

These findings, supported by a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.0001), suggest that ProBC Plus had a substantial and beneficial impact on the immune modulation of the participants throughout the study period.