As showed, the regression equation for EO yield was highly significant ( F = 19.78, P < 0.0001), demonstrating that the degree of fit was better on the border of the independent variables.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Is There Co‐Ordinated Anatomical Change across the CCN? Partial correlation analysis, controlling for age and gender across the regions of the CCN were highly significant ( P < 0.0001) between bilateral dACC nodes, bilateral inferior frontal and left mid frontal nodes of the DLPFC and bilateral inferior and superior parietal nodes of the DPC.
The difference was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001; log‐rank test).
The median score in the P − group was 20.7 [14.2–28.1] compared to 47.9 [39.1–56.8] in the P + group, a difference that was highly significant (Mann–Whitney U test, p < .0001).
Therefore, differences between the CG and the IG were highly significant in both the first and second 6-month follow-up period ( p < 0.0001).
Statistical analyses of absolute abundance values showed that 17 of the top-30 differential metabolites by importance were significantly upregulated in the CMPLXL group versus the CMPLXH group compared with the MOD group, and 13 of these differences were highly significant (P < 0.0001) in both comparison groups.
Markedly, FOXO3a protein expression showed a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) negative correlation with TCRP1 in 144 cases of NSCLC tissues (Fig. 5F ).
Statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences among all six treatment groups (one-way ANOVA, F (5, 114) = 575.3, p < 0.0001).
Notably, PBA administration produced a robust and highly significant reduction in seizure events in Slc6a1 +/A288V mice (** p < 0.0001) (Figure 8G ), mirroring the therapeutic efficacy observed in the Slc6a1 +/S295L model. 4 Discussion 4.1 SLC6A1 Variants Cause Loss of Function via ER Retention and Protein Trafficking Deficits SLC6A1 variants lead to profound GABA transporter dysfunction, disrupting inhibitory neurotransmission through a combination of impaired trafficking, altered protein folding, and reduced transporter activity.
From baseline, the respiratory frequency in the MPA group was significantly lower than that in other groups ( P < 0.001), with the difference remaining highly significant as the MCH concentration increased ( P < 0.0001) (Figs. 3 h).
Statistical analysis using Student’s t-test showed highly significant differences in potency (EC 50 ) between taurine, GABA and HT with p -values: GABA vs. taurine p = 0.0001, GABA vs.
We tested whether WBISI correlated with indices based on fasting measures and found a highly significant correlation between WBISI and QUICKI (r = 0.905, p < 0.0001).
There are highly significant differences of SOD level between rural and urban (P value 0.0001) on the one hand and between rural and industrial area (p ≤ 0.0001) in other.
All correlations and difference between correlations were highly significant (p < .0001).
Expression patterns of hsa-miR-181c and hsa-let-7c KRAS expression exhibited a highly significant, genotype-driven escalation across rs712 and rs9266 variants (p < 0.0001), revealing a clear molecular gradient: WT carriers maintained minimal KRAS expression, whereas HT patients displayed a dramatic surge the highest observed followed by a substantial, though slightly lower, increase in HM.
Decrease in Circulating mDCPs and pDCPs in PAD In patients with PAD, a highly significant decrease in the relative numbers of circulating mDCPs (0.15 versus 0.2; P < 0.0001), pDCPs (0.09 versus 0.12; P = 0.01), and tDCPs (0.25 versus 0.36; P < 0.0001) was observed compared to the controls ( Figure 2 ).
The analysis of variance confirms that the model is highly significant as is evident from Fisher’s F -test (104.99) and a very low P -value < 0.0001.
A one-sample t -test against the test value of five showed a highly significant difference from this test value ( p < 0.0001), with the actual value being significantly higher. 3.8.
Tukey’s post hoc test showed a significant reduction in cell viability for V30 ( p = 0.006) and a highly significant decrease for F30 and F60 ( p < 0.0001) compared with the control group, while no significant difference was observed for V60 ( p = 0.138).
However, Group B demonstrated greater improvement than Group A, with highly significant results (p<0.0001).
Two-way ANOVA (stress × cortical layer) revealed a highly significant difference between cortical layers [F (4, 30) = 40.23, P < 0.0001] and between the two groups [F (1, 30) = 25.59, P < 0.0001)].
Maternal diet was again a highly significant effect ( F 1,191 = 40.4601, P = 0.0001).
Day of sampling and the age of the youngest animal in the group were included in all of the models at level 2 and were highly significant in all models ( p < 0.0001).
The statistical significance of the OPLS–DA model was further confirmed by CV‐ANOVA, which indicated a highly significant separation between treatments ( F = 50.60, p = 1.0 × 10 −4 ), supporting that the observed discrimination was unlikely to result from model overfitting.
Results: Using Pearson’s correlation, tongue thickness was found to be highly significant in correlation with the Cormack-Lehanegrading along with ratio of Pre-E/E-VC thus to predict difficult laryngoscopy with a significant p value of <0.0001.