“highly significant”

The association between phaseolin type and cluster membership was highly significant and nearly complete (χ 2 = 174.72; df = 1; P < 0.0001; Cramér's V = 0.93).

The regressions implicating altitude and latitude of provenances were highly significant ( P < 0.0001), resulting in R 2 ranging between 0.21 and 0.51 (Table 2 ).

There was a highly significant difference in the conspicuity between malignant and benign lesions ( P < 0.0001).

Reductions in hemoglobin and hematocrit were highly significant ( P < 0.0001) ( Table I ).

Cochran’s Q test of heterogeneity (Q) based on the full dataset ( k = 863 observations) was highly significant (Cochran’s Q = 2.6 × 10 4 , df = 862, p < 0.0001) [ 36 ].

This difference was statistically highly significant as the [ P < 0.0001, Table 2 ].

This difference between the inter- and intra-session reproducibility was highly significant ( P < 0.0001; Friedman's test), indicating between-day component of variation.

ANOVA showed a highly significant effect of essential oil concentration and exposure duration on mortality rates ( p < 0.0001).

This difference was highly significant (p < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney U test).

When negative control levels were compared with positive control levels for MTH1 and APE1, highly significant differences were observed (p < 0.0001 vs p = 0.0035) ( Figure 2 A & B & Figure 3 A & B).

Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant difference between the control group and the dropped group ( p < 0.0001), indicating the substantial contamination risk when grafts were exposed to the operating room floor.

The log‐rank tests were highly significant ( P <0.0001), and the graphs illustrate a trend for higher mortality and higher probability of the composite renal end point by increasing cfPWV quartile.

As shown in Table 4 , the model exhibited highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001), with the lack-of-fit term yielding a p of 0.3237 (>0.05).

The difference between the unconditioned and PBM conditioned light damage groups was highly significant ( p<0.0001 ), as were the differences between the saffron-conditioned and unconditioned groups ( p<0.0001 ), and between the combined-conditioned and unconditioned groups ( p<0.0004 ).

Differences in green-red channel ratiometric pixel intensities between front and back were highly significant ( Figure 10G,M ; p<0.0001, Mann–Whitney test).

Among the participants, we found highly significant differences between the two towns in both FT 4 and TPOAb ( p < 0.0001), but not in TSH ( Table 2 ).

As presented in Table 7 , the ANOVA results indicate that the factors of models A, B, C, D, AC, BC, BD, CD, A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 are D 2 < 0.05 (at the 95% confidence level, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and p < 0.0001 was considered statistically highly significant) [ 14 , 20 , 21 ], indicating that the effects of the nitric acid concentration, leaching temperature, liquid–solid ratio, total pressure, as well as the interactions between these factors and their squared effects on the vanadium leaching efficiency were significant.

The mean baseline level of 25(OH)D was 9.59 ± 7.59 ng/mL, and after 6 weeks 19.51 ± 4.27 ng/mL, mean increase being 9.99 ± 6.83 ng/mL, which was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

4 B ; Mann–Whitney U : p < 0.001); furthermore, there was a highly significant correlation with latency to lick on casein trials ( r = 0.45, p < 0.0001), but no correlation for maltodextrin trials ( r = 0.11, p = 0.148).

Across clutches, the mean incidence of FTT was 19.5 + 4.99% of hatchlings, but the range varied from 0% to 53.3%, demonstrating highly significant clutch effects ( X 2 = 48.36, df = 11, P <0.0001; Table 4 ).

The Wilcoxon signed rank test demonstrated a highly significant score difference median (positive delta) for the tablet (Δ 12.85; p = 0.0001, CI 95%) but not the control group (Δ -1.13; p = 0.146, CI 95%).

However, the ANOVA confirmed a highly significant difference between the groups for all three subdomains ( P < 0.0001 for each) and Cuzick's trend test showed a strong, and highly significant, trend towards lower scores with increasing mEHRA class ( P < 0.0001 for each of the three subdomains).

When analyzed with respect to postnatal age, there were highly significant group differences in FB size between on-time and advanced births ( F (1,81) = 69.06, p < 0.0001; Fig. 4 A , left), as well as between on-time and delayed births ( F (1,60) = 56.91, p < 0.0001; Fig. 4 B , left).

When comparing the overall results, a highly significant antiproliferative effect of chloroquine was observed with both concentrations of chloroquine compared to untreated control cultures ( p -value < 0.0001, Mann–Whitney U-test; Figure 2 ).

The difference is highly significant, either against the null hypothesis of equal frequencies (χ 2 = 48.9529, P < 0.0001), against the expected value based on the relative number of CDSs (χ 2 = 50.3648, P < 0.0001; a slightly increased χ 2 is because E. coli has slightly fewer included CDSs than B. subtilis ), or against the expected values based on both relative number of CDSs and genomic nucleotide frequencies ( e.g. , AGAA is proportional to P A 3 P G , AGAAA to P A 4 P G , and so on, where P X is the genomic frequency of nucleotide X in either E. coli or B. subtilis ), with χ 2 = 103.07, P < 0.0001.