“highly significant”

Also association of stigma with quality of life showed highly significant findings in both genders (p< 0.0001) on all the domains of DLQI.

Controlling for weight and food intake, differences in CD11d mRNA abundance comparing controls and high-Ca mice were not statistically significant, but the reduction in CD11d expression in mice fed high-Ca + NFDM remained highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Nevertheless, the highly significant difference between diaphragm and blood host-origin levels (~ 47% versus ~ 13%, respectively; P < 0.0001) in the shielded mice implicates monocyte-independent macrophages as a major contributor to the normal tissue-resident macrophage population of the diaphragm.

In C2C12 mouse myoblasts ( Figure 4 C), all shuffled variants showed highly significant increased functional transduction over rAAV1 (p < 0.0001), rAAV6 (p < 0.001–0.0001), and rAAV8 (p < 0.01–0.0001).

The regression equation between the independent and dependent variables was derived from the fitting process: Y = 29.52 + 0.9 A + 0.6375 B ‐ 1.24 C + 0.675 AB ‐ 0.375 AC ‐ 0.3 BC ‐ 1.76 A 2 ‐ 1.54 B 2 ‐ 2.33 C 2 R 2 = 0.994 The regression model for EE was highly significant ( P < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit term was non-significant ( P = 0.6507), indicating good model adequacy.

This reward benefit effect on latency was highly significant ( F (2,53) = 35.855, p < 0.0001), amounting 31 ms for young adults ( F (1,17) = 13.95, p < 0.002), 30 ms for healthy elderly ( F (1,17) = 6.428, p < 0.022), and 28 ms for PD patients ( F (1,19) = 15.226, p < 0.001).

In contrast, the MFI ratios were much higher for all eight components in the sensitized patients, and these were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for all components against both the non‐atopic and the non‐sensitized groups (Figure 3 ). 3.4 Sensitivity and Specificity of CytoBas Compared to Serology for Allergen Sensitization Detection The diagnostic performance of the AeroDiff CytoBas was evaluated using receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

The analysis of variance confirms that the highly significant model is predicted from Fisher’s F -test (33.68) and a very low P -value < 0.0001.

The mean satisfaction scores between PRP therapy and minoxidil therapy were highly significant ( P = 0.0001).

The overall model for time, treatment and route was highly significant (R 2 = 0.5055; p < 0.0001).

There was a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001, correlation coefficient = 0.62) between the two scores.

Approximately 33.3% of all MC17 isolates were resistant to 5FC and this was found to be highly significant ( p <0.0001, Chi-square; p = 0.0005, Fisher exact test) when compared to the presence of 3.9 and 9.5% of resistant isolates in MC8 and MC3, respectively.

The Pearson correlation coefficient between both parameters was 0.988, a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) positive relationship.

The association between the inner brow raiser and eye movements was highly significant (χ 2 MH = 1322.1, df = 1, P < 0.0001; N = 21).

After evaluating tumor cells (10 random fields) derived from 3 cases, we found a highly significant correlation between the expression of MYC and active β-catenin ( P < 0.0001) (Fig. 6a and the table below, 400×).

FT wAUROC was also highly significant in 141 patients with diabetes 0.80 (0.78–0.82; P<0.0001).

Table 7 shows the fit summary results, the quadratic model is a highly significant and adequate model fitting L-asparaginase production with a very low probability value ( P- value < 0.0001) and non-significant lack of fit ( P- value = 0.7160, F -value = 0.58).

Furthermore, both IgG1 rK39 RDTs (n = 38) and ELISAs showed a highly significant difference in test outcomes between cured patients and those who relapsed (n = 23; P < .0001).

This pathway was predicted to be downregulated in samples from MRD + patients with a highly significant Benjamini-Hochberg p-value ( p < 0.0001, z-score − 6.245; Fig. 1 C).

hyodysenteriae WC antigen in the 20 pigs on the uninfected farm A did not show a significant change during the course of experiment, while there was a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) increase with time in the cohort on infected farm C (Figure 2 , panel A).

The unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio were not significant for all the models except that of QIF which was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) (see, Table 4 ).

The absolute numbers of MAP determined by F57qPCR were approximately two log 10 greater than the CFU counts from culture at respective ODs (Figure 1 ) and a highly significant statistical difference ( P < 0.0001) between all the compared samples was observed.

Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA confirmed that the differences in biofilm formation between treated and untreated groups were highly significant ( p < 0.0001 for Δ agrA and MRSA).

The difference in SARS-CoV-2 prevalence as shown in high- and low- or middle-income countries was highly significant (5.1% [1634/32,053] vs 21.6% [11,521/53,221], P<.0001).

There were highly significant differences between the eight vervet monkey groups for δ 13 C (F 7, 28.2 = 78.9 P<0.0001).