[Chl a] = 10.34 + 5.31 [P] + 2.28 [DO] -1.10 [Tur] - 0.18 [N] - 0.02 [Si] R 2 = 0.81 Where, Chl a = concentration of Chlorophyll-a DO = concentration of dissolved oxygen (mg L -1 ) N = concentration of nitrite + ammonia-nitrogen (μg L -1 ) P = concentration of total phosphorous (μg L -1 ) Si = concentration of silicate (μg L -1 ) Tur = turbidity (NTU) The coefficient of determination (R 2 = 0.81) was relatively high and the relationship described by this equation was highly significant (p < 0.0001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Further, the IBC treatment at 5 μM and 10 μM concentrations showed a highly significant (p < 0.0001) reduction of speck formation in cells, in comparison to the cells induced with ATP, indicating reduced oligomerization ( Supplementary Figures S2E, F ).
The difference was highly significant statistically ( P =0.0001) [ Table 1 ].
In a multivariable analysis the interaction with time to treatment remained highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
On the other hand, the main effect of bias direction was highly significant [ F (1, 9) = 55.131, p < 0.0001].
FA had a highly significant effect on cell viability, explaining 57% of variance (ANOVA, p < 0.0001), while the effect of cort was negligible (1.7% of variance, p = 0.63).
A highly significant positive correlation was evident between VRS score and NP amplitude (y=0.1069x+1.781, r=0.877, n=60, p<0.0001).
The difference was highly significant ( p = 0.0001).
The log-rank test revealed a highly significant difference in survival between the two groups (chi-square = 42.56, p < 0.0001).
Interestingly, the correlation was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Pearson r = 0.704), average scleral thickness being the arithmetical mean of the scleral thickness in each of the four quadrants (Fig. 2b ).
Additionally, we observed a highly significant increase in PAI-1 serum levels caused by a special diet ( F (1, 30) = 49.67, p < 0.0001).
Further analysis comparing the treatment to the sham control revealed highly significant increases in NO production for all the wavelengths, with all the conditions being statistically different from the respective sham controls ( p < 0.0001). 3.2.
The regression models were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and accurate (lack-of-fit, p > 0.05) for all response variables ( Table S2 ), indicating good model adequacy.
The t -test applied for ABIM versus NIM and ABMA versus NMA yielded highly significant result with P < 0.0001*.
This analysis revealed a highly significant correlation between HLA-presentation and the abundance of the source proteins ( p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 5 C ).
The enrichment is highly significant when compared to the frequency of such chromatin for all 23,393 genes we assayed (P <0.0001, chi-square test).
The spatial variability of Rhodes grass productivity was observed to be of the same trend as indicated by the highly significant spatial correlation between the CNDVI values of the first and second harvests, with a correlation coefficient ( r ) of 0.74 ( p = 0.0001).
We found a highly significant and marked response of control neurons to 100 nM orexin A, while the Ox1R knockout neurons did not respond (control: p<0.0001, n=71; Ox1R ΔDAT : p=0.5, n=86; one sample t-test for each group) ( Figure 1L ).
Among treatments, QE and QL produced the highest reduction in bait intake, particularly at higher concentrations (50 and 100 ppm), where differences were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for both sexes.
There was highly significant heterogeneity between the studies ( P < 0.0001).
While the inhibition was highly significant with all three inhibitors ( p < 0.0001), OP decreased the sialidase activity the greatest and lower than the untreated control ( Figure 2 D,H,I).
Marker-trait associations of early vigor in wheat landraces For the water deficit condition, 54 highly significant marker-trait associations (MTAs) were identified across all chromosomes with the FarmCPU method at a significance level of –log 10 P- value >4 ( Table 2 ).
Evaluation of Confidence Levels On comparing the confidence levels of participants before and after the training with the t-test, there was a highly significant improvement with p-value < 0.0001 across all nine aspects as depicted in Figure 2 .
Fisher's exact test indicated highly significant differences across all groups ( p < 0.0001), reinforcing the potential of epitope 5 as a reliable diagnostic marker.
BM32 induced highly significant allergen-specific IgG responses (P < 0.0001) but no allergen-specific IgE.