“highly significant”

Two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of diabetic status on muscle volume (F(1,34) = 119.04, p < 0.0001), with diabetes accounting for 74.08% of the total variance.

A highly significant reduction ( p < 0.0001) was also found in the invasion of the co-culture by the HMLN-1 strain when it was co-inoculated (65.6%) and pre-inoculated (97%) with L. reuteri M4-100 ( Figure 3 ).

MYOCD x CSPG4 correlations were highly significant across the brain regions examined in this analysis (P < 0.0001 throughout).

Based on the results of ANOVA, listed in the Supplementary Materials ( Table S1 ), the regression model for yield was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and the obtained coefficient of determination R 2 value was 0.9868 with a non-significant lack of fit ( p = 0.0557), showing a reasonable representation between the input parameters and the observed extraction yield.

Notably, the difference in the EC50 values of both TNBC cell lines, when compared to EC50 values of MCF-10 cells, was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

Most of the questions of patient satisfaction were statistically highly significant ( p <0.0001).

The difference was found to be highly significant ( P = 0.0001).

For the PMHS, the KMO amounted to 0.955 and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

This difference was highly significant for the screen detected cancers (P <0.0001).

For human genes, highly significant differences were found between G1 and G2 (F = 1.29; p <0.0001), G1 and G3 (F = 1.33; p <0.0001), or G1 and G4 exons (F = 1.33; p <0.0001), while none was found between G2 and G3 (F = 1.04; p = 0.4254), G2 and G4 (F = 1.03; p = 0.4285), or G3 and G4 exons (F = 1.00; p = 0.9243).

As tested by in vitro germination and acetocarmine tests, the analysis of variance clearly showed that storage method, days of storage, and the interaction between storage methods and days of storage had a highly significant effect ( p ≤ 0.0001) on pollen viability.

Interestingly, the expression of both markers increased with tumor stage and grade, with significant correlation to tumor stage: p =0.001 and p =.002, respectively, and a highly significant correlation with tumor grade ( p =0.0001 for both) ( Table 2 ).

A highly significant correlation (r = 0.475, p <0.0001) was also found between the Ct values of the concordant positive saliva and NPS specimens.

Using model estimation of the change in diversity indices associated with 3 months of age we found that the increase in diversity was highly significant for all children as well as those in the case and control groups separately for all diversity indices examined (P <0.0001).

These analyses revealed strong correlations across all three internal data sets (all rho >0.89), with highly significant P values (all P values < 0.0001) (Supplementary Fig. 4a–c ).

3c ) was highly significant in all MOH abusers, particularly in NSAIDs and mixtures groups ( p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0005, respectively) and also in triptans ( p = 0.006) compared to controls.

Identifying Unreliable Primers Bartlett's test of heteroscadasticity (unequal variability within groups), applied to the residuals of each linear model fit by (1), is highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

A two-way ANOVA detected a highly significant effect of light on E PAR (F1,74= 132.20, p < 0.0001) and a significant species vs. light interaction (F3,74 = 9.71, p < 0.0001), while for the main effect of species no significant differences were detected ( p = 0.627).

The highly significant positive slope ( p < 0.0001) of relative amplitude squared on relative period further strengthens the prediction that coupling is present, as seen in the existing three families of clock models 34 , 35 .

Comparison of each MOI group to the control group showed significant (MOI 8: p = 0.0168) to highly significant (MOI 16–256, p < 0.0001) increases in the absolute number of BFP + cells/mm 2 ( Figure 5 c).

The t-test revealed that no significant differences in HI were observed within lines in NIL15-YXZ or NIL15-SBSM ( p > 0.05), but highly significant difference in mean HI was observed between NIL15-YXZ and NIL15-SBSM ( p < 0.0001).

Similarly, comparing feature importance between all pairs of the networks presented here (trained to predict expert scores, stroke versus control, stroke size, movement element impairments) also resulted in highly significant correlations (all p < 0.0001; average r = 0.61 ± 0.05 SEM).

The slope further increased to 199.8 in the 2010s and 379.3 in the 2020s, both showing highly significant growth rates ( p < 0.0001).

Furthermore, the clinical score differences on day four revealed highly significant intergroup variations, with P-values of <0.0001 for LPS + DH-HQ vs LPS, 0.0005 for LPS + DH-HQ vs LPS + DH, and 0.0028 for LPS + DH-HQ vs LPS + HQ (P < 0.005) ( Figure 14A ).

Decoding of uncued orientations was highly significant on both Switch (1–1.4 s after cue onset, corrected p = 0.0001) and Repeat trials (1.05–1.4 s, p = 0.0028, Switch > Repeat 1.25–1.4 s, p = 0.0295; Fig. 5 A , left panel inset).