“highly significant”

All correlations are highly significant (p<0,0001***, Spearman).

When it comes to intra-group difference, test group exhibited a statistically highly significant difference at all timepoints (M0, M3 and M6 versus screening; paired t -test; p < 0.0001).

There was a highly significant correlation between responses to the two artemisinin derivatives ( P <0.0001).

There was a highly significant relationship between larval mortality ( p < 0.0001) and the total percentage of pupae formed ( p < 0.0001) both among concentrations and among different samples of Au-doped ZnO.

All variables included in the SDMs were highly significant for both the pine and the disease (p-value < 0.0001).

On the other hand, the correlation of the MCQ scores with those obtained in the VP exam was highly significant (r = 0.452, p < 0.0001).

For the Mania Scale, two-way repeated measures ANOVA with covariance for baseline showed a highly significant effect of time (F = 16.0, df = 2, 28, p < 0.0001) and a significant interaction of time and side of TMS (F = 5.2, df = 1.4, 19.2, p = 0.04, Greenhouse-Geisser-corrected).

Identifying Unreliable Primers Bartlett's test of heteroscadasticity (unequal variability within groups), applied to the residuals of each linear model fit by (1), is highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

We also confirmed PAR1 expression in samples from our patients using immunofluorescent staining for PAR1 present in the surface of the cells (Figure 1c ), and found 30 patients out of 50 high grade breast cancer patients included in this study (70%) express PAR1; highly significant when compared with the rest of the group (P = 0.0001).

ANOVA indicated that the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with an insignificant lack of fit ( p = 0.3319 > 0.05), demonstrating good overall fitness.

Statistical analysis indicated highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) between N3 and N3-O formulations, confirming that sonication significantly enhances the antimicrobial activity of Ni2CoS4 HSs across both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens.

This was confirmed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test for the slopes, which showed no significant difference between the empirical CDF of the RoPs and the estimated exGaussian distribution ( P = 0.108), but a highly significant difference with the estimated Gaussian distribution ( P < 0.0001).

Degrees of significance were assessed by three different rating values: * p 0.05 (significant), ** p 0.01 (highly significant), *** p 0.001 (extremely significant), and **** p ≤ 0.0001 (extremely significant) or non-significant ( p 0.05). 5.

While both monotherapies induced a modest increase in CD69 expression, the combination treatment led to highly significant upregulation compared with the vehicle ( p < 0.0001 for CD4+, p = 0.0005 for CD8+, Dunn’s test).

Fisher's exact test ( http://www.langsrud.com/fisher.htm ) revealed a highly significant accumulation of stop codons in the 3c sequence of FIPVs compared to FECVs (p < 0.0001). 4.

A highly significant correlation between IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 on a molar basis ( r = 0.84; P < 0.0001) has been revealed.

A highly significant correlation was found between the control group and the samples in the mean amino acid values (r=0.937; p <0.0001) ( Table 2 ).

Gal-9 induced a substantial, highly significant ( P < 0.0001), and dose-dependent increase in SARS-CoV-2 cell-surface attachment ( Figure 2 A).

The ANOVA results from Table 8 show that the quadratic model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and that all main effects (pH, inoculum size, temperature, and time) and their interactions significantly influence amylase production.

ANOVA showed that both season (i.e., autumn and spring) and population had a highly significant effect on mass-specific energy content of lipid and glycogen stores ( P << 0.0001; Table S2 ).

The differences between the cadherin-expressing and the nonexpressing cells were highly significant at all time points (P < 0.0001) after day 2.

The difference between application of sLFS during exploration of one novel cue and sLFS alone ( n = 14) was highly significant (ANOVA, F 1,71 = 34.45; P < 0.0001; n = 8).

There was a highly significant relation between TOSS and FOXP3 gene polymorphism in allergic conjunctivitis patients, p = 0.0001 as displayed in Table 4 .

The level of SC5b-9 increased significantly at T2 in the normothermic group, and the differences between T1 and T2 and between T1 and T3 were both highly significant (P<0.0001, Fig 2B ).

The models were highly significant (p<0.0001) with a non-significant lack of fit (p=0.2729 and 0.1283, respectively).