“highly significant”

Statistical analysis confirmed that the differences between the EO and Trolox controls were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for both methods. 2.5.

Nest growth was a reliable predictor of nest productivity: we found a highly significant, positive correlation between brood value at worker maturation and nest growth (Fig. 3 ; LM, t = 5.85, p < 0.0001).

Inoculation response and patterns of variation The average response to inoculation over all trials was estimated at 115 kg/ha and was highly significant (model 1 a , p < 0.0001).

In contrast, 17.5% of all phosphothreonine sites were dephosphorylated during mitotic exit, a highly significant enrichment compared to 10.6% of phosphoserine sites that were dephosphorylated (χ 2 test, P < 0.0001).

Although the developed model (here tested with the full data set) was highly significant (Likelihood Ratio χ 2 = 3969.2; degrees of freedom, 14; p < 0.0001 the maximized R 2 (Nagelkerke 1991 ) only reached 0.173.

A step-wise regression model of response surface for cheese sensory score (Y) was calculated according to following equation: Y=84+A+0.88B−1.63C+3.50AB−3.00AC+5.25BC−8.38A 2 −2.13B 2 −2.13C 2 In the quadratic regression model, the ANOVA analysis ( Table 5 ) revealed that the second-order response surface model was highly significant ( p <0.0001), which indicated that the model was appropriate.

As expected, the main effect of Time (i.e., repetition) on reading speed was highly significant, F (1, 167) = 33.86, p < .0001, η 2 = 17.

The linear regression analysis of the data showed a strong and highly significant relationship between TPI measures across the two epochs, as described by a slope value of 0.88 and a R 2 of 0.85 (F = 140.98, p < 0.0001; Fig. 5B ), with all data points laying either in the upper right quadrant (consistent preference for Reach-to-Press) or in the lower left quadrant (consistent preference for Reach-to-Grasp).

A highly significant relationship ( p <0.0001) was observed, with a plasma concentration of 355 ng/ml identified as that required for intracellular mycobacteriostasis.

M1 and M2 and M3 vs MCF7 WT and MCtrl, showed an almost four-fold increase with a highly significant difference between KO and Ctrls respectively (p ≤ 0.0001).

[ 99m Tc] TcO4 − (Pertechnetate) A highly significant effect of both the cell line and radioactivity concentration on cellular DNA fragmentation was observed (two-way ANOVA: p < 0.0001 for both factors), indicating that chemoresistance correlates with radioresistance.

Highly significant negative correlations ( p < 0.0001) are only produced by PrCa TSG, yielding coefficients between − 0.35 and − 0.21.

In our study, we observed a highly significant increase ( Table 2 : p ≤ 0.0001; FC = +8.187) in hypoxanthine excretion in all 20 cases studies, which peaked at one hour after alcohol consumption in 18 of the cases, and at 2 hours in the other two cases ( Fig 4E ).

Statistical comparison confirmed that differences between regions were highly significant (χ 2 = 348.0, p < 0.0001), highlighting pronounced regional heterogeneity of the epizootiological situation ( Table 2 ).

The AIs obtained by the TUNEL method were higher than those obtained by the immunohistochemical method using IgG specific for ssDNA. Correlation between AI values obtained by the two methods Regression analysis with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, on plots of AI values obtained by the TUNEL method versus those obtained with the immu- nohistochemical method using IgG specific for ssDNA on a per case basis, showed a highly significant positive cor- relation between the two sets of AIs (Fig. 3; r=0.6613, P<0.0001).

Results A mean neutralization titer 50% of 230 (range, <8‐1765) was seen for the 100 convalescent plasma units, with highly significant ( P < .0001) yet quantitatively limited (R 2 = 0.2830) correlation with results of the ELISA.

There was no significant effect of bird weight (LR = 0.01, df = 1, p = 0.97) or being equipped with a GPS logger (LR = 0.13, df = 1, p = 0.67) on the proportion of time at sea, but stage of the breeding season had a highly significant effect (LR = 35.97, df = 1, p < 0.0001).

Several compounds such as 6 , 15 , and 18 (10–20 mg/kg; s.c.; b.i.d.) showed highly significant inhibitory activity ( p < 0.0001) and at a level approaching that of the MR-1 anti-CD154 antibody used as positive control ( Figure 6 ). 3.

In subjects 6–55 years of age, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of severe disease in the presence of S pneumoniae was highly significant ( P = 0·0001).

This analysis showed observed F ST values, although somewhat low, to be highly significant ( P < 0.0001) ( SI Appendix , Fig.

Furthermore, the regression models used to compute the correction equations for both sexes were highly significant ( F (1, 188) = 1185.8, P < .0001 and F (1, 108) = 593.0, P < .0001 for females and males, respectively) and the CV for the estimate from either model was less than 7.0, indicating that the level of precision was well within acceptable limits.

However, there was a 0.1‐mg/dL increase in creatinine between the screening visit and day −1 to 1.2 mg/dL (1.0–1.6 mg/dL) in the CR group, and this incremental change was highly significant ( P =0.0001) compared with the control group, in which serum creatinine was not altered (1.1 mg/dL [0.9–1.3 mg/dL]).

Total glutathione was decreased by about a factor of two in both mutants and controls exposed to galactose plus paraquat as compared with galactose alone; this difference was highly significant ( P <0.0001; Fig. 6A ).

The ANOVA [ Table 3 ] showed that this regression model was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) with F value of 13.65.

A post-hoc analysis revealed a moderate, but highly significant negative correlation between time from disease onset to diagnosis and disease progression rate (Spearman r = − 0.4798; p < 0.0001).