A highly significant relationship ( p <0.0001) was observed, with a plasma concentration of 355 ng/ml identified as that required for intracellular mycobacteriostasis.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
When capsule was taken into account, the difference in size became highly significant ( Fig 1E ; p<0.0001), suggesting that capsule size increases with base ploidy.
Both the treatment and center effects for k 1 were highly significant ( p <0.0001).
M1 and M2 and M3 vs MCF7 WT and MCtrl, showed an almost four-fold increase with a highly significant difference between KO and Ctrls respectively (p ≤ 0.0001).
There was no significant effect of bird weight (LR = 0.01, df = 1, p = 0.97) or being equipped with a GPS logger (LR = 0.13, df = 1, p = 0.67) on the proportion of time at sea, but stage of the breeding season had a highly significant effect (LR = 35.97, df = 1, p < 0.0001).
Highly significant negative correlations ( p < 0.0001) are only produced by PrCa TSG, yielding coefficients between − 0.35 and − 0.21.
ANOVA analysis indicated a highly significant difference in postoperative Kujala scores across the flexion categories ( P < .0001).
The increases in sub G1 in the 5-FU plus ATRA treated cells, when compared to cells treated with 5-FU alone, were highly significant (P<0.0001).
The AIs obtained by the TUNEL method were higher than those obtained by the immunohistochemical method using IgG specific for ssDNA. Correlation between AI values obtained by the two methods Regression analysis with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, on plots of AI values obtained by the TUNEL method versus those obtained with the immu- nohistochemical method using IgG specific for ssDNA on a per case basis, showed a highly significant positive cor- relation between the two sets of AIs (Fig. 3; r=0.6613, P<0.0001).
The correlation between the observed and expected gene expression ratios, performed by bivariate analysis using JMP 5.1 program, is statistically highly significant (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.93 and p -value < 0.0001) ( Figure 3 ).
LDL-C reductions within each treatment, either as absolute values or expressed as ratio of the initial value, were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
All these results were highly significant (all P < 0.0001) and comparable with results previously published [ 3 ].
In addition, there was a highly significant negative linear correlation between the N% and C/N ( P < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.8844).
The inverse relationship between the axons’ regeneration probabilities and the sizes of their cell bodies was highly significant (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001; Figure 1 C). 3.2.
Statistical significance was determined using ordinary one‐way ANOVA, with highly significant differences (**** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01) for comparisons between consecutive groups, while “NS” indicates nonsignificant statistical difference between the data groups.
The association with pN-category was highly significant ( p < 0.0001); the percentage of cases with ECG doubled from category pN1 to pN2 and tripled from pN1 to pN3 (pN1: n = 89, ECG 19%; pN2: n = 59, ECG = 41%; pN3: n = 51, ECG = 63%).
This reduction of the ADT with time was highly significant for both species (Table 3 ; P < 0.0001).
A logistic regression analysis revealed this to be a highly significant difference (b = 2.74, 95% CI = [1.94, 3.54], z = 6.7, p < 10 −4 ).
The results revealed a highly significant correlation between the MRP and N-myc expression (r=0.795, P<0.0001), and no involvement of the expression of these genes in the prognosis of the patient.
The agreement between the expected and estimated connective field locations shown in Figure 2 a (diagonal cells in the connectivity matrix) is further demonstrated by a highly significant mean (across subjects) Cohen's kappa value (M = 0.68, S.D. = 0.2, t 11 = 12.0, P < 0.0001).
The overall concordance between the two methods in detecting JCV was statistically highly significant (p=0.0001) with a kappa value of 0.659.
Kaplan–Meier survival curves for all groups were compared using a log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test, which revealed a highly significant difference among treatments (χ 2 = 73.94, df = 7, p < 0.0001).
A highly significant association between the presence of p53 gene mutation and nuclear accumulation of p53 protein was found ( P < 0,0001).
Overall, recombinant MUP treatment had a highly significant effect on the release of these VOCs from urine streaks (multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), effect of treatment: F 9,105 = 4.32, p < 0.0001).
In case of HaCaT cells, highly significant viability differences were observed between control, ZnPc or TMPyP versus combination-treated cells ( P <0.0001) at both post-treatment times.