“highly significant”

The crosslinked formulations showed highly significant differences (*** p < 0.0001) according to statistical analysis, with GE-PVA-H10-GNP showing a significantly greater swelling ratio than the others.

There is consistently more D1 dimensions in Group II as compared to Group I in each of interdental sites and these differences were found to be statistically significant for PM/CA, CA/LI and LI/CI while the difference was highly significant with CI/CI, CI/LI, LI/CA and CA/PM (p < 0.0001). 5 Discussion In search of definitive guidelines for attaining esthetics in relation to the proportionate existence of white and pink components, several clinical trials have been reported in the literature pertaining to PCA locations ( de Castro et al., 2006 , Sarver, 2004 ).

The prevalence of LBP was highly significant (p < .0001) among girls (confidence interval [CI]: 1.5 to 3.2; OR: 2.2), those who felt their school satchel was heavy (CI: 1.7 to 3.5; OR: 2.4) and those who watched television (TV; CI: 0.03 to 0.28; OR: 0.09).

This difference was highly significant ( p <0.0001).

Statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences between the control group and both the Recoveron and methanolic propolis extract-treated groups ( p < 0.0001 in both cases).

We confirmed a highly significant positive correlation between these two parameters (Spearman's R = 0.74, P < 0.0001; Fig. 5 c).

All were highly significant ( P <0.0001).

The coefficient of the linear regression between pollen adhesion and fruit seed number was low, but again highly significant too (r 2 = 0.16; p < 0.0001; n = 105).

Likewise, the difference between the T1/T2 and T3/T4 groups was highly significant (p = 0.0001) ( Figure 3 ).

Our model results (see Methods for details) show that the differences between chimpanzees from Ngogo and Issa were highly significant in the δ 13 C values ( χ 2 = 61.45, df = 1, p < 0.0001) and the δ 15 N values ( χ 2 = 80.67, df = 1, p < 0.0001), with Issa chimpanzees being less depleted in 13 C, and much lower in 15 N (Fig. 2c , Table 1 ).

The HR of the lansoprazole group relative to the gefarnate group was 0.2510 (95% CI 0.1400–0.4499), which implied a 74.9% risk reduction, and the difference was highly significant (log-rank test, P < 0.0001) (Table 2 ).

Results remained highly significant in the linear regression model after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, race, education, smoking status, and white blood cell count (ΔTNF-α, p < 0.0001; ΔIL-6, p < 0.0001).

All 4 SNPs showed a similar and highly significant (p-value < 0.0001) relationship between SNP count (0, 1, or 2) and bilirubin levels.

ANOVA showed a highly significant effect of essential oil concentration and exposure duration on mortality rates ( p < 0.0001).

When comparing the choice frequency in the two geometrically correct (C, R) versus the two geometrically incorrect corners (N, F) a highly significant difference was apparent (F(1,9) = 61.714 p<0.0001), revealing more choices for the two geometrically correct corners (C,R).

Using 39 samples (18 like-control and 21 like-C9), we found that the average percent insoluble hnRNP H was 69.2 in like-C9s, and 38.9 in like-control, or 1.78 times higher in like-C9, a highly significant increase in aggregated protein (p<0.0001) ( Figure 2d ; all average percent insolubility values are shown by patient in Supplementary file 1A ).

The results indicate that plants in the SR at T12 exhibited the highest BC load (bcH) (1.94 × 10 06 ± 8.81 × 10 05 particles·mL −1 ) while plants in the RR at T12 exhibited an intermediate BC load (bcM) (7.26 × 10 05 ± 1.83 × 10 05 particles·mL −1 ), with a highly significant difference compared to the SR at that time point ( p < 0.0001).

The sexual dimorphism was highly significant in this genetically diverse population (Sex: p < 0.0001, Fig. 1D , results from complete linear model found in Table S1 ) and the difference in container types contributed no significant effect on survival (Container*Sex: p = 0.12, results from complete linear model found in Table S1 ).

This analysis reproduced the highly significant effect of synchrony (F 1,145.96 = 34.9, p < 0.0001) already found in the 2 × 2 type B model.

In contrast, Ct values showed a highly significant association with sequence coverage ( P = 0.0001), indicating that lower Ct values (reflecting higher viral loads) are strongly correlated with increased sequence coverage.

Although absolute concentrations varied between the ELISA and ECL, the correlation coefficient for CSF A β 42 was r = 0.819 and highly significant ( P < 0.0001) ( Figure 1(b) ). 4.

At this time point, the difference was still highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

For all assays, the effect of sa-mRNA dose (1.0 vs 0.01 μg) was highly significant (p < 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA).

For the inflammaging score (z), both main effects were highly significant: periodontal status (F = 175.67, p < 0.0001) and BMD status (F = 131.80, p < 0.0001) ( Table 5 ).

There was a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001, correlation coefficient = 0.62) between the two scores.