“highly significant”

The model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), yielding the components ‘Age’, and ‘SNP.Dim.14’ as the two most important predictors.

As expected, there was also a highly significant difference between thicknesses in different ETDRS subfields (p < 0.0001) and different layers (p < 0.0001).

NHDF transfected with Smad2 siRNA exhibited a highly significant SMAD2 transcription decrease of 0.1 ± 0.01-fold ( p < 0.0001) compared to negative control siRNA-treated cells, which did not change due to activin A supplementation ( Figure 4 C).

Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance from means is highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

The analysis and comparison of the results of OSCG with controls showed a highly significant difference, with an OR of 16.43 (CI: 5.10-52.94), p <0.0001 ( Table 2 ). - DNA-HPV at multiple sites: 67% of the HPV+ patients of OSCG had two or more positive samples.

The highly significant likelihood ratio tests (p<0.0001) for each model confirm that each subsequent set of variables provided a significantly better fit to the data than the previous one.

On the other hand, the differences were highly significant (P<0.0001) in 2 of the 3 markers and the three different proliferation biomarkers all point into the same direction.

No significant difference was observed in age and gender between the two groups ( p > 0.05 and p = 0.15, respectively). Among the RBC indices, the RDW level was higher and was highly significant in the PD group than in the control group (16.56 ± 2.32 vs. 15.12 ± 2.43; p < 0.0001).

4 D ) and the correlation after pooling across neurons was highly significant (Spearman correlation: ITD: r s = −0.92; ILD: r s = −0.89; both p < 0.0001; two-tailed t test; Fig. 4 E , F ).

3 D , compare lanes 3 and 5; differences were highly significant: P<0.0001).

Once again, students from UiO reported the lowest levels of agreement, while differences between institutions were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 3D ).

Our data suggest a highly significant association of MAS with PH in IUGR neonates ( p = 0.0001 ) but BA, RDS, gender, GA (weeks) and WP as a non-significant risk of PH.

The difference in pre-injury and post-injury cesarean sections was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

There was a highly significant correlation between CMV-DNA copy number and CMV retinitis positive rate ( P < 0.0001).

This difference between cDNA and gDNA is highly significant for each replicate: (Family 1: ANOVA, F 1,6 = 443.36, p<0.0001; Family 2: F 1,6 = 39.60, p = 0.0007; Family 3: F 1,6 = 219.02, p<0.0001).

Myostatin inhibition had no significant effect on BMD from DEXA either on the ground or in flight; however, time following launch was highly significant (p < 0.0001) and time was interactive with spaceflight (p < 0.0001) but not myostatin inhibition treatment.

Considering all five species, the difference between the years is highly significant for O. kevoensis (χ 2 = 69.5, P < 0.0001), whereas in O. inclinans the difference is only marginally so (χ 2 = 4.6, P = 0.03).

For both assessors, this difference in the immune cell pattern was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

However, only one locus pair (STR One8 and SNP One_U1012_68 ) showed strong evidence of being physically linked, with highly significant tests ( p < 0.0001) for departure from linkage equilibrium in each sample year.

Tests of equality of group means showed that the increase in the number of CD8+ cells and IFN-γ expression levels in irradiated tumors were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and that either measure was 100% accurate in predicting treatment response.

In the medial and inferior constrictor muscles, cricopharyngeal muscle, glottic and supraglottic laryngeal areas, arytenoid cartilages, contralateral major salivary glands highly significant dose reductions ( p < 0.0001) of more than 10 Gy were achieved in study treatment plan compared to standard treatment plan.

rmANOVA regarding response time showed a highly significant main effect of order, F (2, 38) = 12.13, p ≤ 0.0001, but not regarding condition, F (1, 19) = 1.36, p = 0.26, as well as no interaction effect of order and condition, F (1.24,23.56) = 0.22, p = 0.7.

2 All R 3 m values associated with API that were observed to disperse in PVPVA were assigned a probability of 1 and all API that did not disperse were assigned probability of 0, and the model remained highly significant having p < 0.0001, a pseudo R 2 = 0.91, and χ 2 = 1.52 × 10 4 .

Chi-square test for trend was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Comparison of the MO versus MO breathing histogram ( Figure S3B ; Figure 4A , gray trace) with the odor discrimination tasks revealed a highly significant difference ( Figure 4 ; Kolmogorov-Smirnov [K-S] test, p < 0.0001 for all odor pairs), indicating that increased sniffing occurred only when mice were conditioned to discriminate odors.