“highly significant”

The results showed that the higher prevalence in L-farms is statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

The difference between patients with and without prior experience with sleep‐inducing drugs was highly significant when comparing the rate of drugs received in the hospital (84% vs 37%; P < .0001) and the wish to continue the drugs after hospitalization (60% vs 27%; P < .0001).

Its frequency was significantly higher in Rufiji than in Kilombero-Ulanga between 2001 and 2002, yet the increase of this allele during 2001- 2002 period was highly significant in both Kilombero-Ulanga (p ≤ 0.0001) and Rufiji (p ≤ 0.0001).

There is a highly significant difference between obese women and control women in terms of body fat percentage (42.3±0.9% and 32.0±1.9%, respectively, p<0.0001).

This was confirmed by comparing the intersample dissimilarities between samples, which were larger for the data sets from acidified soil and were highly significant ( P ≤ 0.0001) (see Fig.

This is not to suggest that the [ 38 ] outcomes are typical, although the percentage differences in amino acid digestibilities in wheat-based diets recorded in the same study were very similar to maize given the highly significant linear relationship ( r = 0.925; p < 0.0001).

This was highly significant ( p <0.0001).

There was a highly significant difference in the treatment method distribution between generalists and specialists ( p < 0.0001) in the sample of displaced fractures of the femoral neck.

Frequency of tobacco consumption in pre- and post-health educational interventional phase was found to be highly significant difference ( P < 0.0001), whereas there was no significant difference in comparison of both of the phases regarding the type of tobacco product consumed [ Table 1 ].

For the awake group, there was a highly significant difference ( P < 0.0001) in all brain regions between the test–retest and the memantine-challenge conditions.

Overall, the difference between the four groups was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) due to much earlier gestational age at delivery in women with previous PPROM and treated with Arabin pessary (Figure 2 ).

The extraction temperature ( X 2 ) and time ( X 3 ) showed a highly significant impact on the extracted amount of rhein because of their p -values of <0.0001.

Highly significant associations were observed after haploytpe analysis with plasma insulin levels, HOMA -IR , HOMA- β-cell , and QUICKI estimates (Global P < 0.0001 for all associations) ( Table 3 ).

In addition, we found a highly significant association between tumours with concomitant CIS and low ANXA10 expression ( P <0.0001, χ 2 -test).

The results showed that, following correction, the pooled MD for DBP remained highly significant at −7.83 mmHg (95% CI: −9.88 to −5.79, p < 0.0001).

Among LAC patients with additional tissue section available for next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based analysis, 26/193 (13.5%) patients found positive for even low-rate EGFR-T790M mutated alleles at baseline were associated with a highly significant lower survival in comparison to those without (8.7 vs. 47.4 months, p < 0.0001).

The median values observed for the homozygous animals showed a highly significant difference ( P < 0.0001) from those of hyperoxia-exposed control (+/+ and +/−) mice.

This 1.65-fold gene enrichment is highly significant ( P < 10 − 4 ).

The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was .94, and the Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant (chi-squared = 1399.29, df = 44, p < .0001).

Each of these differences in the functional composition of the sets of paralogs and unduplicated genes were statistically highly significant (p < 0.0001, χ 2 test).

Overall, zymosan treatment which was used for positive control resulted in a highly significant increase of both types of NETs, i.e., “cell free”- and “anchored”-NETs in bovine PMN ( p < 0.0001; Figures 3E–H ).

Consequently, comparing cases with the G/G genotype to controls with the G/G genotype, there was a highly significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean TAS value: 0.049 (p<0.0001).

Mixing was a relatively sensitive method of detecting the most highly significant changes (p < 0.0001) (86% of changes detected), however it was not very specific; as many as one third of gene expression changes showing p < 0.05 in mixed samples were not confirmed by individual profiles.

All three analyses showed highly significant interactions between PST and light ( p = 0.0001, p = 0.0002, p = 0.0009, for PST content, production, and C fraction, respectively), a significant interaction between lytic toxicity and whether the strains contained PST ( p = 0.0157 for PST content), and significant effects of lytic toxicity on growth ( p = 0.0125, p = 0.0175, for PST production and C fraction, respectively).

Furthermore, the difference between EL4–B7-1 and EL4–B7-2 or EL4–B7-1+ B7-2 in the incidence of tumor rejection and tumor volume was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).