“highly significant”

This was significant only for gata2b u 5008/ u 5008 , but Pearson’s correlation was highly significant across genotypes (Pearson correlation −0.77, p < 0.0001).

Finally, logistic regressions show no significant relationships between phenotypic and environmental values at the outset (pseudo- R 2 s ≈ 0.0, P values > 0.1), but show highly significant relationships at the ends of the simulations ( P < 0.0001 for all values of Φ), with the amounts of variation explained increasing as a function of selection strength (pseudo- R 2 = 0.327 for Φ = 0.01, 0.376 for Φ = 0.05, and 0.406 for Φ = 0.1).

We found highly significant positive correlations between the identity levels of allergens and the representative helminth (r = 0.70, P<0.0001), protozoan (r = 0.64, P<0.0001) and fungal (r = 0.47, P = 0.0011) organisms suggesting that a conserved protein allergen in HPF is also conserved to a similar level in human.

The model fit was highly significant, even after Bonferroni correction ( p < 0.0001), for predicting the mean graft survival time after finishing the six-month evaluation period.

For the total cases, the test statistics of both LM-lag and LM-error were highly significant, whereas Robust LM-error ( p -value < 0.0001) was more significant than that of Robust LM-lag ( p -value = 0.0003).

Notably, almost all comparisons were highly significant in noncirrhotic patients ( p < 0.0001).

This difference in the distribution of unique peptides derived from the structural (P1) versus nonstructural (P2P3) segments of the polyprotein in the anti-HSP90 pulldown product versus the cell lysate was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 4D ).

Strikingly, the activity in lymphoblasts showed a highly significant positive correlation with levels of DHRSX protein in this cell line (see Figure 1 J) (NADH: R 2 = 0.9667; p < 0.0001, NADPH: R 2 = 0.9910; p < 0.0001; Figure 3 E).

While we do not detect significant accumulation of mutations over the sampling period in this clade, both the global phylogeny and a subset sample of 1220 B.1.1 genomes including this clade exhibit a highly significant temporal signal following randomizations of sampling date ( P <1×10 −4 ) (Figs S11 and S12).

Stretching resulted in a more moderate yet highly significant increase in γH2Ax-positive nuclei both in leiomyoma and myometrium cells (OR = 1.6 and P < 0.0001; Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 12 ).

The McNemar test for correlated proportions was highly significant (p < 0.0001), indicating that the hrHPV mRNA proportions are not comparable, although this differed between age groups.

Heritability was highly significant for all adrenergic and renal traits: plasma norepinephrine (h 2 = 66.5±5.0%, p<0.0001), plasma epinephrine (h 2 = 66.5±5.1%, p<0.0001) and plasma dopamine (h 2 = 56.5±5.6%, p<0.0001).

For all heat strain variables, the splines te(T a , p a ) modeling the influence of temperature and humidity were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

But the mean increase was minimal 5.83% in Group D (4 beats, P = 0.0848), when compared with Group E 14% (9.81beats; P = 0.0152) and Group C 30% (24.9 beats; P < 0.0001), which was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

ANOVA analysis ( Table S2 ) shows that the quadratic regression model was highly significant ( p -value > F-value: F-value = 24.18 and p -value = 0.0001) and reliable (Std.

1 B) confirmed by the highly significant correlation between the two (r s = 0.763, p < 0.0001).

0.85) and produced a 60% steeper calibration slope, a difference confirmed to be highly significant (ΔAICc = 28.26, p < 0.0001) (Figure 4B ).

Adding the total lung histo-scores according to “the cause of death categories,” a highly significant difference was found between the strong and contributive, as well as between the strong and the weak association with COVID-19 fatal outcomes categories ( p <0.0001).

There were no significant differences between the treated groups, but statistical differences between treated groups and control groups were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

The log-likelihood test for the null hypotheses that all of the coefficients in the model are simultaneously equal to zero indicated that the joint significance of the explanatory variables was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

ChatGPT-5 again had the highest score (71.67 ± 6.17), followed by DeepSeek-V3.2 (66.00 ± 5.07), Gemini (61.67 ± 5.88), and Claude Sonnet (59.00 ± 6.87), with a highly significant overall difference ( p < 0.0001).

The ANOVA results demonstrated that the quadratic model was highly significant (F-value = 152.61, P < 0.0001), with a non-significant lack-of-fit term (F-value = 1.74, P = 0.2971), confirming the model’s adequacy.

In addition, while CRP and Neopterin showed a highly significant decline post-treatment regardless of strain ( p < 0.0001 for all), B 2 M showed differential decline depending on strain ( p = 0.0153 for Mtb and p = 0.0048 for Maf ) and levels were still significantly higher at 6 months in Maf compared to Mtb infected subjects ( p = 0.0051).

MFI showed highly significant expression differences for CD38, CD81, CD19, and CD200 (p < 0.0001).

3b) , which is highly significant for CCL4 (p<0.0001, post test for linear trend).