“highly significant”

Regarding retention scores, a highly significant treatment effect was found (H [3] = 21.24, p<0.0001).

F ST estimates were highly significant ( P <10 -4 ) between Dielmo and the populations of the Senegal River basin and between Mbilor and the populations around Guiers Lake area (Diaminar, Gankette and Loboudou).

The month/year effect was strong, as can be seen in Fig 5 , and was highly significant (p < .0001) in all cases.

The analysis revealed a highly significant difference in symptom severity distribution (χ2 = 18.13, p = 0.0001, and degrees of freedom = 2).

In the larger cohort, ATL reductions remained highly significant ( p < 0.0001), further validating the potential of this metric as a treatment-responsive parameter.

Student’s t -test analysis showed that the redox differences between the two subpopulations are highly significant ( p < 0.0001 for NADH and the redox ratio and p = 0.013 for Fp).

The “Model F -value” was highly significant, with only a 0.01% likelihood of being influenced by noise ( P < 0.0001) (Table S2 ).

When it comes to intra-group difference, test group exhibited a statistically highly significant difference at all timepoints (M0, M3 and M6 versus screening; paired t -test; p < 0.0001).

The interaction between the two subgroups was highly significant ( p < 0·0001) ( Fig. 1 ). 3.3.

When all datasets were combined, we found a highly significant association of younger age at diagnosis with increased CIN70 scores (p < 0.0001).

There was a highly significant negative correlation between the viral alpha diversity (Shannon diversity index) and the fraction of viral reads matching integrase genes in each sample ( p -value < 0.0001) ( Figure 2 D). 3.5.

In a univariate logistic regression, we observed a highly significant positive association between the composite index score and the likelihood of aflatoxin detection (OR 1.6, p < 0.0001).

This difference was highly significant( p < 0.0001) [ 4 ].

The negative correlation between burden and RANTES fold change was highly significant (Fig. 5 c, Pearson r = − 0.27, p < 0.0001).

The association between ILD prevalence and RA duration was highly significant (P<0.0001).

As shown in the table, the model was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) and well fitted ( p -value of the misfit error term was 0.0823 > 0.05).

*, p < 0.05 (significant); **, p < 0.01 (very significant); ***, p < 0.001 (highly significant); ****, p < 0.0001 (extremely significant); and ns, p > 0.05 (not significant). 3.

The ANOVA results indicate that the fitted quadratic model is highly significant, with a model F‐value of 55.56 and a p value < 0.0001, which implies that the model is highly suitable for describing the relationship between the independent variables and the TPC yield.

The results of the main analysis using an adjusted model, controlling for multiple covariates, were however highly significant (χ 2 = 1317·65, df = 7, p < 0·0001; Table 2 ); consistent with our hypothesis, the 22q11.2 deletion was a significant independent predictor of risk of T2D (OR=2·44, 95% CI = 1·39–4·31).

Significant increases in glycogen synthesis were observed starting at 20 μmol/L ( p < 0.05), while 40 and 80 μmol/L showed highly significant increases ( p < 0.0001; Figure 2C ). 3.3.

In contrast to the weight of the primary tumour, the mean value of the number of lung metastases was 481±98 in wild-type scid mice and 75±37 in E- and P-selectin-deficient scid mice, with the differences between the two groups being highly significant ( P <0.0001; see Figure 2) .

wound infection biofilm antimicrobial antiseptic hypochlorous acid human plasma biofilm model wound irrigation chronic wound internal grant program of the Faculty of Health at Witten/Herdecke University, Germany IFF2018-61 German “Initiative Chronische Wunde e.V.” (ICW e.V.) Both reference substances, OCT/PE and PHMB-based irrigation solution, achieved a highly significant reduction of P. aeruginosa (4.77 ± 1.41 and 5.25 ± 0.93 log 10 steps, respectively; p < 0.0001), S. aureus (6.18 ± 0.00 and 4.82 ± 1.36 log 10 steps; p < 0.0001), and MRSA (both 6.18 ± 0.00 log 10 steps; p < 0.0001) within 30 min of exposure ( Figures 2A – C ).

Multiple regression analysis of the experimental data correlated the response and test variables according to a second-order polynomial equation: (8) EE = + 85.41 + 1.34 X 1 + 4.86 X 2 + 2.59 X 3 + 1.87 X 1 X 2 − 0.65 X 1 X 3 + 1.07 X 2 X 3 − 1.47 X 1 2 − 9.52 X 2 2 − 2.10 X 3 2 Table 1 shows that this model had highly significant fitness because its F-test had a high F-value (116.14) and a low p -value ( p < 0.0001).

It corresponds to a decrease of 27.4%, which is highly significant ( t 112 = 11.73; p < 0.0001).

Statistical analysis confirmed that the tumor growth inhibition by Mn-TK and Mn-BR was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), highlighting the efficacy of these treatments.