“highly significant”

In both cases, there was a highly significant (p < 0.0001) negative correlation between FEV 1 (% pred.) and LCI.

The results allow us to conclude that the differences in the level of RNA synthesis between the HG and IntG parts of the genome were statistically highly significant at all age points presented ( p - value < 0.0001).

In both the citalopram and pramipexole groups, the BDI score showed a highly significant decrease with a large effect size ( r ≥ 0.6) analyzed by a Wilcoxon signed-rank test ( Z = −4.018, P < 0.0001, and r = −0.877 for citalopram group and Z = −3.926, P < 0.0001, and r = −0.878 for pramipexole group).

Friedman's analysis of variance revealed that there was a highly significant variation at all frequencies (p = 0.0001).

However, a highly significant difference was observed among the groups for pain scoring, with a p-value of <0.0001 at all times (Table 2 ).

In the analysis of variation among the frequencies in each ear alone, we noticed that it was highly significant (p<0.0001-t Student test) in all the frequencies for both the right and the left ears.

A statistically highly significant interaction of beverage type × storage time was also demonstrated ( p < 0.0001).

However, when comparing G-II with G-III, a highly significant decrease in AST, ALT, ALP, and prothrombin ( p value <0.0001) was observed in G-III (data not shown in this work). 4.

Seventy-four samples were run in parallel using both methods, and there was a highly significant correlation between the two measurements (r = 0.97, p <0.0001).

The differences were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Nevertheless, on day 7 which was 2 days after the 3rd dose of STZ injection, all groups that received STZ showed a highly significant difference in fasting BGL as compared to the control group injected with saline ( p < 0.0001).

The cranial base length showed a weak negative correlation with AHI ( ρ = −0.25; p < 0.05) but showed a strong and highly significant correlation with the mandibular length ( ρ = 0.70; p < 0.0001).

Alveolar septal fibrosis was observed in 90.9% of patients with IPF (30/33), whereas none of the control subjects exhibited this finding (0/23), indicating a highly significant difference between groups (Fisher's exact test, P<0.0001).

SPLS model coupled with PFS analysis indicate highly significant difference at 6-month between the two patient strata for MM (100% R vs 15% NR, p<0.0001) and mUC (80% R vs 20% NR, p<0.01).

Results All the clinical parameters for periodontal status in the periodontitis group compared to healthy volunteers were highly significant (p < 0.0001).

By one-way ANOVA, the main effect of genotype on all four genes was highly significant (p<0.0001), and for each gene, at least four of the six pairwise genotype comparisons showed significant differences in expression ( Supplementary file 3 ).

Our result showed that lower ureteral wall thickness was associated with a higher chance of stone passage, and the correlation was highly significant (p-value < 0.0001).

Regarding the time interval between coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass grafting, there was a statistically highly significant difference between the patients with and without acute kidney injury (7.8 and 11.9 days, respectively; p = 0.0001).

At 30 days post-injury, B cell-treated animals showed highly significant improvement in Y maze performance (p < 0.0001), with better alternation scores as compared to saline-treated ICH controls and values similar to sham-injured controls ( Fig. 2 E).

Under 200 mg/kg of Cd 2+ , the Cd 2+ contamination in the shoots and roots of transgenic plants was 24.6−30.5% and 45.5−51.3% higher than that of the WT, respectively ( Figure 4 c,d), and all of the transgenic lines showed a highly significant difference compared with the WT ( p < 0.0001).

Statistical analyses revealed highly significant differences between infected groups sampled at 12 h and 96 h for both genes ( p < 0.0001).

Marble burying was strikingly increased by both treatments and two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of time (F = 49.16, df 1,47 p < 0.0001) and treatment (F = 12.67, df 2,47 p < 0.0001) and a significant time X treatment interaction (F = 12.67, df 2,47 p < 0.0001) (Fig. 6D ).

The association between wing and molecular markers, assessed for 1214 colonies from the M-lineage range, was highly significant but not strong (r = 0.31, p < 0.0001).

A One-Way ANOVA with repeated measures shows that the difference between conditions was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), whereas there were no differences between run 1 and run 2 (see Tables 2a and 2b ).

Linear regression analyses revealed a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) difference between the curves of the control measurements ( Figure 2 a).