“highly significant”

G2 also showed improvement, from 1.54 ± 0.61 at T0 (range 1–3) to 0.97 ± 0.62 at T1 (range 0–3), with a highly significant change (p < 0.0001).

The total SUPPS-P Impulsivity Score was lower in smokers (50.2) than in non-smokers (53.3), and the difference was highly significant (p<0.0001), suggesting overall greater impulsivity among non-smokers.

Even though average pre- and post-test scores were highly variable among schools (p<0.001, ANOVA) the pre- to post-change within each individual school was highly significant (p<0.0001, paired t test).

There was, however, a numerically highly significant tendency ( P < 0.0001 by Mann–Whitney test) towards reduced Irgb6 vacuole loading intensity in Irga6-deficient cells relative to the wild-type (wt) cells ( Fig. 6F ), suggesting that the presence of Irga6 may stabilize the loading of Irgb6.

These improvements were further supported by statistical comparison using DeLong’s test, which confirmed that the observed differences in AUC were highly significant (all p values < 0.0001).

Identifying Unreliable Primers Bartlett's test of heteroscadasticity (unequal variability within groups), applied to the residuals of each linear model fit by (1), is highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

In knowledge, differences are statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

These two tests reveal a highly significant difference (P< 0.0001) between the values of wing-shaped Procrustes in the females of the three species ( Table 3 ).

At PN50, the resulting blood Pb 2+ levels in these animals was 22.2±0.9 μg dl −1 ( n =47) for Pb 2+ exposed rats and 0.6±0.1 μg dl −1 ( n =64) for control rats, a difference that was highly significant ( P <0.0001).

The same conclusion was reached by a study conducted in Guatemala on the link between the nutritional status of children with cancer and socioeconomic status, which showed that SES was associated with the nutritional status of children with cancer, the lower the SES, the greater the nutritional vulnerability, with a highly significant association ( p < 0.0001) ( 32 ).

This difference was highly significant, with a p -value of <0.0001 and a mean difference of 7.8 h (95% CI: 6.0 to 8.0), indicating a prolonged analgesic effect when dexamethasone was added to the block, as seen in Table 2 and Figure 2 .

The values obtained are highly significant (P < 0.0001).

longicolle at this site was statistically highly significant ( χ 2 = 64.3, P < 0.0001).

Factor Model Analysis According to the ANOVA results presented in Table 5 , the BCF model for As is highly significant (F = 27.74, p < 0.0001).

The test revealed a highly significant association (χ 2 (38) = 3616.46, p < 0.0001, V = .12), indicating that the SOC profile of ADRs varies substantially depending on the anti-EGFR agent.

As shown in Table 3 , the model was highly significant (P < 0.0001)and statistically significant.

The random sample ID effect was highly significant for both sensitivity and specificity (p < 0.0001), even after adjusting for Ct-value.

Quantitative analysis confirmed highly significant differences between NPM1wt and NPM1c+ cells in nucleolar rim intensity ( P =0.0001) ( Fig. 3B ) and nucleolar circularity ( P <0.0001) ( Fig. 3C ).

Significance analysis of regression coefficients reveals the linear term A (trehalose) is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), B (lactose) is significant ( p < 0.05), and C (skim milk powder) is highly significant ( p < 0.01).

By day 30, the DG exhibited characteristic features of granule cell dispersion (GCD), with loosening of the granule cell layer, blurring of the boundary between the granule cell layer and molecular layer, and expansion of granule cell distribution ( Figure 1 C), in line with previous observations in experimental and human TLE [ 46 , 47 ].Quantitative evaluation of NeuN immunofluorescence demonstrated a highly significant, progressive increase across the evaluated longitudinal time points from day 1 to day 30 post-modeling (One-way ANOVA, F (4, 10) = 2495.0, p < 0.0001).

Both models were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with adjusted coefficients of determination (R 2 adj ) between 0.72 and 0.78.

The highly significant positive slope ( p < 0.0001) of relative amplitude squared on relative period further strengthens the prediction that coupling is present, as seen in the existing three families of clock models 34 , 35 .

The P for trend was calculated by treating HIV/CD4 group as an ordinal variable with four levels (0 to 3) and was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

As shown in Figure 1 a,b, there was a highly significant correlation between results from the sVNT and the live-virus NTs for both variants (Spearman’s r = 0.92 and r = 0.80 for WT and Omicron, respectively, both p < 0.0001).

The mean preoperative satisfaction score was 42.88 ± 19.3, while the mean postoperative score was 84.83 ± 7.6, statistically highly significant improvement ( p < 0.0001).