“highly significant”

By two-tailed t-test, all markers exhibited highly significant (P<0.0001) decrements in immunoreactivity in the AD twin compared to the ND twin ( Figure 2b ).

The differential cellular distribution of ALCAM between pancreatic cancer and corresponding normal pancreatic tissue was highly significant ( P =0.0001, Table 1 ).

Correspondingly, the present study on the association of the SNP rs13181 with predisposition to Breast cancer showed a significant to highly significant positive association of greater than 2-folds for the rs13181 homozygous mutant (CC) (OR 4.412, 95% CI 2.413 to 8.068, P < 0.0001), heterozygous (AC) (OR 2.086, 95% CI 1.246 to 3.492, P = 0.0056) and combined mutant (AC + CC) (OR 2.672, 95% CI 1.647 to 4.334, P < 0.0001) genotypes.

(2022) found no significant differences in input resistance and spike width between Calb2 and Chrna2 cells, whereas we found highly significant differences in these parameters ( p < 0.0001 and p = 0.01, respectively, in pairwise comparisons), and also in the initial firing frequency and adaptation ratio (Extended Data Fig. 9-1 ).

In a repeated measures ANOVA analysis this was highly significant ( P <0.0001) for a genotype effect on lean mass in grams in males and females ( Fig. 3B and Table 2 ).

The difference between two groups is statistical highly significant; p<0.0001.

The χ 2 test was highly significant (P ≤ .0001) as was the Fisher's Exact Test (P = 7.96 × 10 -9 ).

There was a highly significant correlation between CSA and echotexture grading (p = 0.0001).

In the same study, the rate of complete spectacle independence was 83% in the PanOptix group but only 33% in the Vivity group, which was a highly significant statistical difference (p<0.0001).

The data on tumor outgrowth kinetics were pooled for two experiments (Figure 2e ), yielding a highly significant difference in the outgrowth ability of sFRP1-expressing cells ( P < 0.0001, two-way RM ANOVA).

There was a highly significant association between TIA-1+ and Granzyme B+ cells (p<0.0001).

Trend was highly significant for any HPV type, any high risk type, and low risk type, at p < 0.0001 for each, significant for HPV 16/18 at p = 0.0004 and HPV 16 at p = 0.0153, and not significant for HPV 18 at p = 0.2217.

Comparisons of mean T cell frequencies in active and inactive SLE samples and controls revealed highly significant associations (P < 0.0001) with the disease in general, and confirmed the inverse correlation with disease severity in particular ( Fig. 6 C ).

The variance of the random effect was highly significant in all these models (p<0.0001).

Moreover, a highly significant difference in the number of resin tags was observed between the groups ( P < 0.0001).

The mean logMAR BCVA improvement (mean number of injections=5) and reduction in CMT from the baseline was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

This difference was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

At 4 wpi, the mean plasma viral load was 4.0 × 10 6 copy eq./mL A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was performed for all metabolites across all time points and brain regions, and highly significant differences were found (P < 0.0001).

The correlation coefficient between LCT*P frequencies and latitude was highly significant ( r = 0.274, p <0.0001).

We repeated this 2500 times to build a null distribution of Δβ, and calculated the proportion with equal or stronger reductions for a one-tailed p-value, which was highly significant (p<0.0001).

To further reveal the interrelationship between N400, P600, and behavioral scores, we first performed a correlation analysis, which revealed a highly significant positive correlation between the change in N400 and the change in P600 ( r = .769, p < .0001).

Differences in acceptability between the two treatment forms were highly significant (p < 0.0001, effect size 0.9): half of the participants allocated to the chocolate treatment found it hard to eat 50 g of dark chocolate every day and 20% considered it an unacceptable long-term treatment option, whereas all participants found it easy and acceptable to take a capsule each day for blood pressure (Table 4 ).

Interleukin 6 in urine showed a significant increase after N 2 exposure and a mild decrease after He exposure, resulting in a highly significant difference for interleukin 6 production between N 2 and He after exposure ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 6 ). 2.5.

The Kruskal-Wallis test for median traffic count by categories of each traffic question was always highly significant (p < 0.0001).

These differences were highly significant for both wild type and Atxn2 ko mice (ANOVA with repeated measure, P<0.0001).