“highly significant”

The overall F-test from ANODIS was highly significant (P < 0.0001, Table 2 ).

Both the treatment and center effects for k 1 were highly significant ( p <0.0001).

The relationship between APS2 and composite endpoint was highly significant (p < 0.0001), yet was not significantly different when stratified by age (p = 0.94) or sex (p = 0.337).

Quartile analyses confirmed minimal LPS effect in μG ( p = 0.1755), while differences between 1G and μG were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

5C , polyphosphate concentration had a highly significant effect on surface protein concentration (P < 0.0001), which was directly reflected in the marked increase in EAI across all treatments.

The statistical difference between IDH- m/w groups (Table 2 ) using Mann Whitney test was highly significant for KYN ( P < 0.0001), NLR ( P = 0.0002), TIMP-1 ( P = 0.0405) and hTERT ( P < 0.0001).

RT-qPCR analysis showed that when HOTTIP was interfered with, the expression level of miR-216a-5p exhibited a highly significant upward trend ( P < 0.0001, Fig. 2G ).

To further validate the relevance of Sox9 and Sparc for the osteo‐lineage cells and chondrocyte populations, we analyzed the coexpression of the regulating element ( Sox9 ) with the osteonectin coding gene ( Sparc ), which was highly significant ( R = 0.86, p < 0.0001, Fig. 3 G ).

Genotypic effects were highly significant in nearly all environments ( p < 0.0001); the sole exception was 23_WL, where IR was non-significant ( p = 0.0876) and both traits showed low heritability (IR: H 2 = 0.19, h 2 = 0.03; SV: H 2 = 0.27, h 2 = 0.05) (Table 1 ), consistent with uneven disease pressure.

The decreasing trend in odds ratios with increasing age at first birth was highly significant (P<0.0001).

When comparing users to their friends, this correlation is highly significant with a p ≤ 10 - 4 .

Significant increases in glycogen synthesis were observed starting at 20 μmol/L ( p < 0.05), while 40 and 80 μmol/L showed highly significant increases ( p < 0.0001; Figure 2C ). 3.3.

S3 and S5 gave highly significant increase in solubility with p < 0.0001 with no significant difference between them ( p = 0.6891, > 0.05), which means this method was more efficient in the complex formation.

The percentage reduction from baseline disability scores revealed substantially greater therapeutic efficacy in group B, with a mean reduction of 65.20% with a standard deviation of 14.67% compared to 46.26% with a standard deviation of 18.42% in group A, yielding highly significant differences (t = -4.187; p = 0.0001) and a large effect size (Cohen's d = 1.183).

This synergy was confirmed through two-way analysis of variance and multiple t -tests, which showed highly significant interactions ( P < 0.0001)[ 33 , 48 ].

The ANOVA results indicate that the fitted quadratic model is highly significant, with a model F‐value of 55.56 and a p value < 0.0001, which implies that the model is highly suitable for describing the relationship between the independent variables and the TPC yield.

A highly significant correlation between GPR and FOXP3 was observed for both GPR ( Figures 4A, B , p<0.0001).

Specifically, post-hoc comparisons revealed that the difference found when analysing samples at 24 and 48 hpi was highly significant (P<0.0001 for both N1 and N2 gene sequences, Fig.

However, when we compare the cumulative data for all time points of the pooled control (negative and solvent control) to the replicates of the positive control, the difference for the moved distance between these two groups was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Fig. 3 ).

Results: Patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma exhibited significantly elevated levels of epithelial membrane antigen and cytokeratin-1 compared to non-hepatocellular carcinoma patients, with a highly significant statistical difference ( P < .0001).

A highly significant difference between the aligned read depths was observed, with a mean depth of 560±237.88 for the iPCR samples and 312.87 ± 372.72 for the pPCR samples ( P -value < 0.0001; paired t- test).

Temporal and Road Type-Based Trends of Raccoon Dog Roadkills Although highly significant (F 5,3229 = 25.0, p < 0.0001), the GLM model explained only 3.6% of the raccoon dog index variance.

The results demonstrate that essential oil type and concentration have a highly significant effect on the change in Phaeococcomyces cell count (p < 0.0001).

These observations were statistically validated with a Kruskal-Wallis H test, which showed a highly significant result (P < 0.0001), confirming that the medians of the ratios differed significantly across the four phases.

Nominal logistic regression indicates that the line, age, and line-by-age interaction effects are all highly significant ( p <0.0001, Figure 1C ), but six lines show an opposite trend, ie. reduced failure rate with age.