“highly significant”

Results: The comparison of the fingerprint patterns in each group was found to be statistically highly significant (p=0.000).

The likelihood ratio statistics (LR chi-square (60) = 356.33) are highly significant P < 0.0000).

These results were calculated using the Wald method with continuity correction factor and were highly significant due to the large number of people sampled ( P < 0.0000).

Here again the differences were highly significant (χ 2 531.4, p<0.0000).

Highly significant differences (p = 0.000) were found between subgroups A and C, A and E, A and F, A and G, A and H with subgroup A providing significantly worse results.

A highly significant association was found between the oral hygiene and socioeconomic status (p=0.000).

The AIDA total score differed highly significant ( p = 0.000) between the patient sample and the students with a large effect size ( d = 1.02).

All the parameters showed a greater variability and an almost-constant growth from one month to another, except for plant weight that did show a highly significant (p = 0.000) increase between the first measurement and the second.

The principle component was applied to conduct confirmatory factor analysis and the KMO was 0.913 and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.000).

The effect of smoking on OHI-S was found to still be highly significant ( P = 0.000), while the other independent variables, age, sex and occupation, were not.

Correlation Analyses between Scores of Complaining of Dry Eye and Ocular Surface Analysis Indicators A highly significant inverse correlation was observed between the value of OSDI and NIBUT (rs = −0.982, P = 0.000) ( Figure 1 ).

According to BMI groups a highly significant difference in many patient satisfaction domains were found (P< 0.000).

A highly significant correlation was found ( r = 0.93, p ≈ 0.00).

Analysis using ANOVA reveals a significant main effect (F = 3.293; p = 0.017) during the L phase with pair-wise comparisons (LSD) revealing highly significant differences in animals injected with IVIT 6-OHDA and PARA when compared to their pre-injection performance (p = 0.000 and p = 0.019, respectively).

Pearson’s correlations were highly significant for both bacterial and plant feeders (n = 96 and n = 57 respectively and p = 0.000 for both).

- Marginal Bone Loss The random-effect model showed highly significant heterogeneity between the studies (I2=97.9%; p =0.00).

Years of experience also yielded highly significant results (p = 0.000), with health workers having five to 15 years of experience showing the highest number of highly satisfied responses of 23.2% (n = 70).

The log-rank test (Mantel-Cox) for equality of survival curves shows a highly significant difference ( P = .000).

The intercept is highly significant ( p = 0.000) with an estimate of 62.171, providing a baseline for the Safety Climate score.

This is highly significant ( P < 0.000).

In our case, it is highly significant ( P = 0), indicating that there is more than one species in our sample.

Turning to the multivariate analysis in Table 2 , the first model showed that rural–urban residence was a highly significant ( p = 0.000) predictor of health status.

The correlation between FNA-Tg and FNA-TgAb was found to be highly significant (P = 0.000; Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.537) ( Figure 3 , Table 6 ). 4.

Subsequently, the education level of traditional pig farmers was found to be a highly significant risk factor for STH worm infection among traditional pig farmers in Bali (OR: 7.579; 95% CI: 2.621-21.915; p=0.00) ( Table-3 ).

However, 3–5 days after surgery, pair-wise comparison of proportions revealed a highly significant effect of ION severing on the percentage of nose insertion into the slot ( P = 0.000; n = 12 sessions with 318 trials).