“highly significant”

The results showed that school advising parents to listen to their child reading or read aloud with their children was found highly significant (P = 0.000) and positive (Tau-c = 0.163) with students ‘academic performance.

The mean pretest score was 15.36 (SD 1.79), which had risen post-test to a mean of 17.16 (SD 1.59), and the calculated two-tailed P value suggested improvement in the post-workshop score, which was highly significant ( P value < 0.000; 95% CI -2.46 to -1.14).

The correlation between PGDF-BB and platelets from PRP was also highly significant ( r = 0.90, P < 0.00) as shown in Figure 2 .

Another important result of the study was a highly significant relationship between the southern region where the participants lived and their EI ( p =0.000).

There was a highly significant association between the source of information and the level of knowledge about the causes of ASD (P=0.000).

The difference between the values before and after was statistically highly significant (p=0,000, Independent Samples Test).

In the present study, we found a highly significant correlation (rho, 0.498; p = 0.000) between total IgE levels in serum and sputum in our overall sample, a finding that is consistent with the results described by Manise et al. in asthmatic patients[ 28 ].

The F-statistic of the model is highly significant ( p < 0.000 with 18; 5501 degrees of freedom), meaning there is a significant relationship between expected household consumption and the explanatory variables.

The effect of gender was highly significant in favor of males compared to females with a mean difference of 5 ISQ ( p =0.000).

The highly significant value of the Kruskal–Wallis test (Chi-Square = 80.08, p -value = 0.00) revealed statistically significant differences among hospitals from distinct classes of competence regarding the supply method.

The lowest C22 value was found in the fifth sampling of Itrana (0.14 mg/kg), whereas the very highly significant highest value ( p = 0.000) was in the fourth sampling of Sinopolese (16.93 mg/kg) which showed a different alkane profile with respect to the other studied cultivars ( Table S2 ).

Although highly significant ( p = 0), the estimated coefficient of the geographic distances in the IBD model including all individuals was very low (β = 6.27E‐05, SE = 1.10E‐06, t = 57.06), as was the pseudo‐ R 2 (0.075).

This model examines the direct link between innovation capacity and financial performance, revealing a highly significant relationship between the two variables ( β = 0.129, T = 6.06, p = 0.000).

The results showed highly significant QFO - > EWA (β = 0.640, T-stat = 14.077, p > 0.000).

Family history of cancer was also found as highly significant ( p <0.000, Odds ratio 16.45, 95 % CI 7.49-36.16) risk factor for GBC.

When scores on the first principal component were included in alternative Model 2b together with the variables from Model 2, the component was a highly significant predictor of symptom improvement for both PTSD (HTQ) (β = 0.30 p = 0.000) and depression (HAM-D) (β = 0.25 p = 0.001).

At 12 months, the VR shows a positive mean of 76.69% (range −135.68 to 100.00%), and at 18 months, a near-complete VR is achieved with a mean of 98.47% (range 73.68–100.00%), both highly significant ( P = 0.000).

A highly significant correlation was found ( r = 0.93, p ≈ 0.00).

Moreover, the correlation coefficient of the sequencing data and qRT-PCR result using β-actin as reference gene reached 0.992 (R 2 = 0.984) ( Figure 6 ), which was highly significant ( p < 0.000).

1B ) were highly significant, but their coefficients of determination were lower than those observed for the corresponding soil-to-hepatopancreas regressions (E1 phase: p = 0.000, R 2 = 0.737; E2 phase: p = 0.000, R 2 = 0.581).

The final multivariate logistic regression model identified age as a highly significant risk factor for hypertension among people on ART (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.055-1.11, p=0.000).

The observed AUC-ROC (0.715) and measure of Se AUC-ROC (0.034), despite being highly significant (p-value ≈ 0.000) has limited potential to confer these genetic variants as predictors for athlete’s discrimination in the light of the obtained Kappa statistics and F1-measure.

We found a highly significant (p<0.000) summary SMD of 2.6 with a CI of [2.5, 2.7].

A one-way ANOVA established that there was a highly significant difference between the concentrations of ssDNA released when spores were treated with varying microwave exposures for DS1813 ( p = 0.000), and DS1684 ( p = 0.035).

Concerning the quantitative evaluation of new bone formation in the CSD, treatment either by PRF either alone (PRF group) or in combination with ZnONPs (PRF/ZnONPs group) revealed a highly significant ( P = 0.000) increase in the percent of CSD filling rate versus the control group (Fig. 2 ).