This difference was highly significant during ages 4–9 years ( p < .0001), with the largest cluster volume (664 mm 3 ) in the left parahippocampal gyrus at age 9 years.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
All the correlations presented here are highly significant ( p < 0.0001) except when stated.
Respiratory coupling above .25 Hz was highly significant ( p < .0001; Figure 3A ), whereas cardiac coupling above 1.7 Hz was modestly significant ( p < .0142; Figure 3B ). 3.1 Risk assessment model The individual seizure values underlying Figure S3 served as features for training a logistic model, producing propensity scores for each seizure, which further distinguished SUDEP from non‐SUDEP cases.
Permutational multivariate analysis of variance confirmed that compositional differences among the three associations were highly significant (F = 7.658, p = 0.0001, 9 999 permutations), a result corroborated by the rank-based test of similarity ( R = 0.6135, p = 0.0001).
Statistical Inference Precision: The article reports highly significant p -values (e.g., p < 0.0001) from experiments with only three biological replicates per group.
The analysis revealed highly significant differences for all three parameters ( p < 0.0001), confirming that the type of plant extract used in FeNP synthesis had a substantial impact on catalytic performance ( Table 6 ).
In contrast, 135992 and 135993 showed highly significant differences between B-ALL and AML co-cultures (p < 0.0001 for both).
The amount of residual disease following primary laparotomy was also highly significant (X22 = 40.8, P<0.0001).
PTPs showed a highly significant pattern of positive selection ( p < 0.0001) using the M-K test, despite having an average dN/dS below 1.
As shown in Table 2 , both the response models were highly significant (p < 0.0001).
Using a simple two-hit model to account for the difference in chromosome number, and the ratio of break points attributable to translocations and intrachromosomal rearrangements in mammals to estimate the expected number of translocations in nematodes, the failure to observe any validated translocation events in nematodes is highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Accordingly, the second-order polynomial equation was established as follows: Y = − 9.16012 + 0.123691 × A + 0.143075 × B + 0.162185 × C − 0.0001375 × A × B − 7.5 × 10 − 5 × A × C + 3 × 10 − 5 × B × C − 0.0014058 × A 2 − 0.0013893 × B 2 − 0.0015433 × C 2 From Table 2 , it is evident that the model’s regression is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with a lack of fit of 0.3369, exceeding the significance threshold of 0.05.
Correlation analysis There were highly significant negative correlations between anxiety and depression scores and LAC ReHo values in the DON group ( r = -0.9336, P < 0.0001 and r = -0.8453, P < 0.0001, respectively; Figure 5 ).
For the WAI values of the bean flours, there are highly significant differences between pretreatments and particle sizes ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 1(a) ), as well as significant interactions between both factors ( p < 0.05).
A combined analysis indicated a significantly greater reduction in the VPB burden associated with acupuncture treatment when compared to pharmacological therapy (relative risk, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08–1.25), with no significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%) and a highly significant P value ( P < .0001), as illustrated in Figure 2 .
For the four different carbohydrates, at both time points, for leaves four, five, and six, the differences between sut1 and wild type were highly significant in all cases ( P <0.0001).
Statistical modelling of FICI values The results of the Wald χ 2 tests from the fitted linear mixed-effects model evaluating FICI values indicated that antibacterial combination had a strong and highly significant main effect on FICI values ( p < 0.0001), as did compound ratio ( p < 0.0001), indicating that both the identity of the combination and the dosage ratio influenced the degree of synergism.
Notably, a pronounced and highly significant difference was observed in SEP thresholds (F = 90.39, p < 0.0001, Figure 3(b) ).
Difference highly significant (p < 0.0001).
It corresponds to a decrease of 27.4%, which is highly significant ( t 112 = 11.73; p < 0.0001).
The mean difference of 8.73 was found to be statistically highly significant (P<0.0001).
Both IL-12 preparations resulted in highly significant activation of CD4+ and CD8+ cells (p < 0.0001 each) with no significant difference in between heterodimeric IL-12 and single-chain IL-12 (CD4+: p = 0.124, CD8+: p = 0.092) concluding equal bioactivity for both cytokines (figure 5B ).
The trim-and-fill analysis imputed two additional studies, resulting in an adjusted pooled HR of 1.24 (95% CI: 1.13–1.37), which remained highly significant ( P < .0001) and similar to primary analysis.
Feasibility of analyzing Norwegian and Danish data as a single pooled sample In the sensitivity analysis combining Norwegian and Danish data, country was a highly significant predictor of KN score (likelihood ratio χ 2 (1) = 47.89, P < .0001), with Norwegian dogs having 1.77 times higher odds of a worse KN score compared with Danish dogs (OR, 1.769; 95% CI, 1.505-2.079).
Likewise, the 10-mm diffusion tip with 15 W power yielded a highly significant correlation (r = 0.995, p < 0.0001).