Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp <10 −60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The CCorA model applied revealed that there was only a single canonical dimension between the two datasets, which was found to be very highly significant ( p <10 −6 , Wilks'-Lambda test); this first dimension corresponded to a canonical correlation of 0.99, which accounted for 67.2% of the total variance.
highly significantp = 10 −60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For HR2, PON1 activity was highly significant (protective) in an unadjusted model ( p = 10 −6 ); continued to be highly significant in a collection of models adjusted for gender, age, and a set of covariates added one-at-time; and finally remained significant ( p = 0.0003) in a model adjusted simultaneously for all covariates of the dataset (gender, age, UAE, past CVD, DM, apoB, use of statins, anti-hypertensives, smoking, ethanol use, and eGFR).
highly significantp < 10 −60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Wave speeds were generally slower for adult Ceacam16 β gal/ β gal TMs (median: 4.55 m/s; iqr: 3.68–4.76 m/s; n = 49 measurements from five preparations) than for wild-type TMs (median: 5.88 m/s; iqr: 5.12–6.62 m/s; n = 50 measurements from six preparations), and the difference was highly significant ( p < 10 −6 in Welch’s t -test, with t = 6.55 and 68.1 (dof), computed using the Satterthwaite approximation ( 40 )).
highly significantp < 0.0000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The log10-transformed engorged larval weight was a highly significant predictor of the log10-transformed unfed nymphal weight, and the former explained 72.7% of the variation in the latter (Fig. 4 ; regression: F 1, 651 = 1738, p < 0.000001; correlation: r = 0.854, t = 41.859, df = 652, p < 0.000001).
highly significantp-value<1 × 10 −60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Following previous umbrella reviews, 13 we considered as convincing the associations with>1000 cases a highly significant association (p-value<1 × 10 −6 ), no large between-study heterogeneity, no evidence of excess significance bias or small study effects, and a 95% prediction interval excluding the null value.