Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp = 5.39e−110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
To mirror testing of our own data, we used the first four PCs of the Procrustes‐fit GM data for heritability detection, finding three of the four PCs as demonstrating highly significant heritable variation (PC1: p = 5.39e−11, PC2: p = 2.65e−05, PC 3 : p = 0.814, PC4: p = 0.005) at a Bonferroni‐corrected significance threshold (α = 0.0125).
highly significantp-value = 5.41e-110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The protein-protein interaction network comprised of 44 nodes and 49 edges at an average node degree of 2.23 with a highly significant interaction enrichment (p-value = 5.41e-11), indicating that these proteins form at least a partially connected biological group. 3.5 Zebrafish functional validation The TF genes DACH1, WT1 , and LMX1B , which were downregulated in DN based on our DEG analysis, are master regulators of gene expression in podocyte differentiation.
highly significantp = 0.55 × 10 −100.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results from the two remaining trials (LATITUDE ( NCT01715285 ) and STAMPEDE ( NCT00268476 )), representing 82% of all men randomised to AAP plus ADT versus ADT (without docetaxel in either arm), showed a highly significant 38% reduction in the risk of death with AAP plus ADT (HR = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.53–0.71, p = 0.55 × 10 −10 ), that translates into a 14% absolute improvement in 3-year OS.
highly significantP = 5.94 × 10 −110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Within the studied range of DC field intensities (–6 to +6 V/m), a log‐linear regression confirmed a highly significant exponential relationship between the oscillatory frequency and the DC field intensity ( F (1,11) = 604.34, P = 5.94 × 10 −11 ), indicating that the model accounts for more than 98% of the variance in the data.
highly significantP = 6e-110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
reatic adenocarcinoma ( n = 117; Spearman correlation = 0.36; P = 9.3e-7) and to illustrate negative correlations between RECQ5 and BRCA2 expression in breast cancer (BRCA; n = 1080; Spearman correlation = −0.24; P = 6.8e-16) and uveal melanoma (UVM; n = 80), where the negative correlation was very highly significant (Spearman correlation = −0.65; P = 6e-11).
highly significantp = 6.58×10 −110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Confirmatory genotyping in the 2nd stage By genotyping of these associated SNPs using a custom BeadChip (Illumina) in a different sample population of 1,671 individuals from the Yamagata cohort, we successfully confirmed all these associations at highly significant levels ranging from p = 6.58×10 −11 (rs500498) to 1.33×10 −21 (rs8176746) for P-LIP and from 2.96×10 −10 (rs2073824) to 8.34×10 −39 (rs495828) for ACE in 9q32, and also from 1.13×10 −29 (rs4461142) to 5.21×10 −107 (rs4362) for ACE in 17q23.2, as listed in Tables 1 and 2 .
highly significantp = 6.8e-110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
First, there was a very highly significant correlation (r = .99, p = 6.8e-11) between the progression of recognition scores for words and consonants as a function of SNR (respectively Figure 2 and Figure 5 ), whereas the correlation between the progression of recognition scores for words and vowels was lower (r = .94, p = 3.8e-6), but still high.