Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP = 2.7 × 10 –130.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In this analysis, we identified a highly significant overlap P-value with a positive correlation between the DG of adult Cn mutants (mutants vs. controls) and the DG of infant mice (2-week-old vs. 1-month-old) ( P = 2.7 × 10 –13 ; Fig. 3 d and e, Additional file 2 : Table S5), indicating a significant similarity in the gene expression patterns between them.
highly significantP < 2.7 × 10 −130.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Specific KEGG Signaling Pathways and Common Peptides Further evaluation of three highly significant pathways ( P < 2.7 × 10 −13 ) showed that the T cell receptor pathway, TNF signaling pathway, and NF-B signaling pathways shared common peptides that were significantly different between jejunal samples from chickens on the control diet compared to those on the supplemented diet Table 5 . shows the significant peptides within the T cell receptor pathway, TNF signaling pathway, and NF-κB signaling pathways.
highly significantp = 2.8 × 10 −130.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Influence of Phylogeny and Disturbance-Induced Thaw on ARGs Although the abundance of ARGs increased with FPES disturbance levels (UD = 101, SD = 133, MD = 145), we found the number of CARD hits per isolate was highly significant by phylum (Kruskal-Wallis p = 2.8 × 10 −13 ; Figure 3 a) rather than FPES site (Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.083; Figure 3 b).
highly significantP = 2.956E-130.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation between Hong Kong Red List and four traits At the national scale, Spearman’s rank correlation indicated a weak but statistically significant positive association between China Red List status and habitat ( r s = 0.153, P = 0.0062; P < 0.05), and a negligible yet highly significant positive correlation with trade ( r s = 0.009, P = 2.956E-13; P < 0.001).
highly significantp = 3.29 × 10 −130.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The overlap between our data and all cancer types in TCGA was highly significant, both for miRNAs within a fusion transcript in at least one tumor (odds ratio 2.93, 95% CI [2.15–4.03], p = 3.29 × 10 −13 , Fisher’s exact test), for miRNAs recurrent in our data and with at least one fusion in TCGA (odds ratio 2.99, 95% CI [2.29–3.93], p < 2.20 × 10 −16 , Fisher’s exact test), as well as for miRNAs recurrent in both data sets (odds ratio 3.03, 95% CI [1.75–5.39], p = 2.62 × 10 −5 , Fisher’s exact test).
highly significantp = 3.412 × 10 −130.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found a highly significant main effect of stimulus modality on PSE shifts (Monkey M: β = 31.07, t (44) = 10.22, p = 3.412 × 10 −13 ; Monkey P: β = 6.044, t (44) = 8.457, p = 3.394 × 10 −9 ), as well as moderate evidence for an interaction between stimulus modality and self-motion amplitude (Monkey M: β = 733.5, t (44) = 3.016, p = 4.248 × 10 −3 ; Monkey P: β = 67.78, t (28) = 2.371, p = 0.02487).
highly significantp value = 3.56 × 10 −130.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found that the protein products of genes within the WGCNA modules had highly significant functional interactions forming densely interconnected networks ( Fig. 14 A , mouseUP module, 1,136 nodes; average node degree, 8.2; PI enrichment p value = 3.56 × 10 −13 ; Figure 14 C , mouseDOWN module, 712 nodes, average node degree, 15; PI enrichment p value < 1.0 × 10 −16 ).
highly significantp=4.1×10 -130.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The data were analyzed using log transformation of GDF15 levels ( Figure 2b ) and a highly significant relationship with the reciprocal of pre-pregnancy BMI was apparent (standardized β=0.266, p=4.1×10 -13 , n=721).This relationship was replicated in the NIPTeR Study ( Figure 2c & d ; standardized β=0.280, p=1.5×10 -5 , n=231).
highly significantp = 4.3 × 10 −130.0× alphaqualifiedgold
All R values shown in the scatter plots were highly significant for SC and BP choices (SC&BP-graded regions in Fig. 5 c: R = 0.17, p = 4.3 × 10 −13 and R = −0.15, p = 7.8 × 10 −12 ; SC/BP-graded regions in Fig. 5 d: R = 0.26, p = 3.3 × 10 −28 and R = −0.19, p = 2.0 × 10 −21 ; SC&BP-graded parietal region in Fig. 5 e: R = 0.17, p = 2.9 × 10 −6 and R = −0.16, p = 1.3 × 10 −6 ; two-tailed Spearman’s correlation).
Graded decisions in the human brain.
Nat Commun · 2024 · PMC11109249