Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 2.2 e - 160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The variance of differences for the genomic GC proportion in humans, mice, and fruit flies respectively is σ ^ n 2 = ( 0.000673 , 0.00055 , 0.00103 ) compared to σ ^ r 2 = ( 0.00469 , 0.00552 , 0.0021 ) for the permuted genome sequence, with the ratios being highly significant in all cases (F-test with p-value p < 2.2 e - 16 ).
highly significantp = 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Finally, we observed a highly significant increase (one-sided Student’s t -test, p = 2.2 × 10 −16 ) in average epistasis values in the winning CR genotypes compared with the overall population, indicating that positive epistasis plays an important role in determining the fittest genotypes in this selection (Fig. 5b ).
highly significantp < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This revealed a highly significant association between gene age and expression specificity in both species ( D. melanogaster : χ 2 = 1092.66, df = 5, p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ; A. aegypti : χ 2 = 890.74, df = 5, p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ), indicating that stage‐specific genes are significantly enriched for evolutionarily young genes. 2.4.
highly significantp = 2.2e‐160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When examining 92 age‐associated metabolites, the correlation between the age beta coefficient was highly significant ( r = 0.79, p = 2.2e‐16; Figure S2B ), suggesting the reliability of our method. 91 of them changed with age in the same direction, among which 27 were statistically significant.
highly significantP value = 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Comparing the two sets of genes, we observed a highly significant overlap of 193 genes whose expression was altered by either IL-1β treatment and IL-1R8 deficiency (Fischer’s exact test; P value = 2.2e-16; Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.95; 61.7% downregulated and 38.3% upregulated, Supplementary file 3 ).
highly significantp < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Subsequent statistical analysis revealed a highly significant ( p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ) cell cluster composition between the baseline sample NI Day + 0 ( n = 217 cells) compared to differentiated samples S Day + 15 ( n = 577 cells) and SON Day + 15 ( n = 400 cells) as well as between the differentiated samples ( Figure 3 C, Table S5 ).
highly significantP − value < 2.2 × 10 − 160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The investigation into the relationship between the effect sizes of ASVs and their respective taxonomic groups revealed highly significant results (Kruskal–Wallis test, P − value < 2.2 × 10 − 16 ) for both N conditions on all three days, suggesting a disproportionate enrichment of large effect ASVs within certain taxonomic groups.
highly significantP < 2.22e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Our second question: Did adaptation to the media or the presence of SA alter phage resistance? Our analysis revealed highly significant effects of both Treatment ( F = 132.73, df = 3, P < 2.22e-16) and Condition ( F = 41.83, df = 4, P < 2.22e-16) on the area under the growth curve, as well as significant Treatment × Condition interaction ( F = 37.66, df = 12, P < 2.22e-16).