Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Consistent with previous reports ( Vetter et al., 2004 ), there were highly significant differences in both impedance magnitude ( Figure 5B : χ 2 = 311.86, p < 2.2 × 10 −16 , df = 8; Kruskal–Wallis test) and phase angle ( Figure 5C : χ 2 = 164.72, p < 2.2 × 10 –16 , df = 8; Kruskal–Wallis test) during the first WPI.
highly significantP -value < 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We observed a highly significant difference in the mean correlation values ( P -value < 2.2e-16, lower-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test), with a median correlation value of -0.15 for the differentially methylated promoters detected by MethylDriver, more than twice as strong as the average association for all promoters ( Supplementary Figure S4 ).
highly significantp-value < 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
0.00276, Fisher's exact test p-value = 1.34e-05), there is a highly significant excess of sites supporting the species topology (0.00229 vs. 0.00210, Fisher's exact test p-value < 2.2e-16) and deficit of sites in these regions supporting ILS topologies (0.00042 vs. 0.00066, Fisher's exact test p-value < 2.2e-16, Fig 2B and 2C ), which suggests that the observed reduction of ILS is not the result of a lower mutation rate.
highly significantp < 2.2e‐160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Pearson correlation analysis of these whole‐sample average expression profiles revealed highly significant correlations between replicates (Peach: r = 0.94, p < 2.2e‐16; Nectarine: r = 0.91, p < 2.2e‐16), with LOESS regression confirming the linear relationship (Figure S15A ).
highly significantP = 2.2E-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
DNMT1-Dependent DNA Methylation in Adult Interneurons Affects Degradative Pathways In stark contrast to the comparison of the 18 months old genotypes, we determined a highly significant overlap ( P = 2.2E-16, Fisher’s Exact test for gene set enrichment analysis; odds ratio = 0.434) of 645 genes between young control and Dnmt1 knockout interneurons, which display significant differences in both DNA methylation and gene expression ( Pensold et al., 2020 ).
highly significantp < 2.2 × 10 –160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A one-way ANOVA confirmed that the differences among residue classes are highly significant ( F (3, 14,983) = 682.6, p < 2.2 × 10 –16 ), supporting the hypothesis that CDR loops correspond to weakly coupled, energetically uncoupled regions when compared to the structural core of nanobodies.