Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In fact, the least significant (i.e., highest) p -value observed in any factorial ANOVA corresponded to a main effect term (intrinsic disorder in Plants: p = 4.13 × 10 −6 ), while all other terms across all analyses were highly significant ( p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ).
highly significantp < 2.2×10 -160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Supporting this hypothesis, a comparison of the mean coverage of the nuwt regions to that of the non-nuwt regions showed a small but highly significant difference between them (Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction, p < 2.2×10 -16 for all 13 samples).
highly significantP < 2.2 e –160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This finding of 50% sensitivity (considering only the peaks that strictly overlap a site) is highly significant (Fisher’s exact test; P < 2.2 e –16) and is a strong indication of the quality of the results, all the more so as the literature derived studies were performed in a variety of species and cell types.
highly significantP < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Similarly, the differences in length and Alu count of the downstream intron between the predominant A5BS circRNAs and the other A5BS circRNAs were highly significant ( P < 2.2 × 10 −16 ; Figure 4E , F ) while they were much less or not significant for the upstream flanking introns of A3BS circRNAs ( Supplementary Figure S5C, D ).
highly significantp < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Based on the comparison of intact to degraded cartilage, the log-fold-changes in RNA expression and the differences in mean promoter region methylation values demonstrated a small but highly significant correlation (Pearson’s r = −0.08, p < 2.2 × 10 −16 , Fig. 2b , Supplementary Table S7 ).
highly significantP < 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For all three species comparisons, a linear regression of %ID and log 2 hybridization ratio showed a strong and highly significant correlation ( D. sechellia : Multiple R 2 = 0.3257, P < 2.2e-16; D. simulans : Multiple R 2 = 0.2920, P < 2.2e-16; D. yakuba : Multiple R 2 = 0.4083, P < 2.2e-16) (Figure 2 ), with the data for D. yakuba showing the strongest correlation.
highly significantp < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The lack of parents’ gender information made the genotype combinations of simulated offspring more complex and the PMS more difficult to find, but regardless of gender, the association between PIC and PE was very strong and both were inversely related to PDI ( Table 2 ), with the correlations between the three being highly significant ( p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ).