Barely Significant
← all phrases

“fell just short of statistical significance”

126 sentences · 126 papers · 142 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.12

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Students' times to run/walk 1 mile fell just short of statistical significance in predicting systolic hypertension (odds ratio [OR], 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99–1.33; P = .06), but overweight significantly predicted systolic hypertension (OR, 3.42; 95% CI, 1.5–7.8) ( Table 6 ).
Moreover, 3C revealed that transcriptional down-regulation is associated with a disruption of RAG locus conformation, with a significant reduction in ASE– Rag2 promoter contacts and a reduction in ASE– Rag1 promoter contacts that fell just short of statistical significance ( P = 0.06; Fig. 7 C ).
There was a significant correlation between relative IHL reduction and relative reduction in HbA1c percentage (ρ = 0.49,p = 0.01); the correlation between absolute changes fell just short of statistical significance (ρ = 0.38,p = 0.06), not surprisingly given the wide range of starting values of IHL, and the strong relationship between the starting IHL and the absolute reduction in IHL (see below).
At the follow-up, no significant change was noted in nonstigmatizing attitudes toward mental illness ( t 23 =–0.268; P =.80), whereas an increase in the levels of mental health knowledge fell just short of statistical significance ( t 24 =1.987; P =.06).
A multivariate analysis showed that independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality were as follows: NYHA class III/IV (odds ratio [OR] = 2.7; 95% CI = 1.2–6.1; p = 0.01), moderate/severe RV dysfunction (OR = 2.6; 95% CI = 1.2–5.8; p = 0.02) and lower prothrombin time (OR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.96–0.99; p = 0.008); clinical signs of heart failure fell just short of statistical significance (OR = 2.4; 95% CI = 0.9–6.5; p = 0.06).
In the SCOT-HEART (Scottish Computed Tomography of the Heart) trial of 4146 patients with stable chest pain CCTA was associated with an apparent increase in coronary revascularization when compared to ICA (11.2% vs 9.7%), although this fell just short of statistical significance (P = 0.061).