Barely Significant
← all phrases

“fell just short of significance”

103 sentences · 103 papers · 120 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

fell just short of significanceP < 0.081.6× alphagold
Follow-up analysis of this interaction component revealed that there was significant learning in both genotypes (smaller F (11,176) = 11.39, P s < 0.0001), while the two genotypes were significantly different at all test days except day 1, where there was no genotype difference (F < 1.00, P > 0.5), and day 6, where the difference fell just short of significance (F (1,176) = 3.23, P < 0.08; smallest remaining F (1,176) = 7.49, all P s < 0.01).
fell just short of significanceP = 0.0811.6× alphagold
The interaction with population was nonsignificant in both linear and quadratic terms for fertilization rate, seed maturation rate, and relative female fitness, while the interaction with population fell just short of significance for the rate of nonpredation ( P = 0.081 and 0.082 for linear and quadratic, respectively) (Appendix S9 ).
fell just short of significancep = 0.091.8× alphagold
Mann–Whitney U -test comparisons 1 confirmed that the ASD and PLI groups had significantly poorer quality of friendships than the Typical group (ASD versus Typical: ( U = 0, z = −4.41, p <0.01; PLI versus Typical: U = 18, z = −2.85, p <0.01), while the comparison between the SLI and Typical group fell just short of significance ( U = 90, z = −1.67, p = 0.09).
fell just short of significancep = .153.0× alphagold
Finally, when the effect of category brightness on response speed was assessed separately for the light and heavy response keys, the effect for the heavy key fell just short of significance, F (1,18.02) = 2.20, p = .15, η p 2 = .11, while the effect for the light-weight key was not significant, F (1,18.02) = .08, p = .77, η p 2 = .005.
In addition, VEGAS2 identified the microRNA MIR5189 on chromosome 16, which is located within an intron of ZFPM1 while MAGMA identified CAPRIN2 adjacent to IPO8 (Importin 8) on chromosome 12 which itself fell just short of significance by both methods; we provide functional evidence below that IPO8 is the causal gene at this locus ( Fig. 1B , Table 2 , Supplementary Tables S3 and S4 ).
A similar association was found for SCR to the occurrences of the noise blasts (i.e., children exhibiting less reactivity to the blasts across the three signaled trials were rated as higher in boldness by their parents), although this association was somewhat weaker and fell just short of significance.