Barely Significant
← all phrases

“failed to reach significance”

4,114 sentences · 4,114 papers · 4,976 search hits before verification

In the literature

failed to reach significanceP = .03060.6× alpha
Tube‐restraint–stressed mice traveled longer distances than control mice in the first and second 5‐minute blocks of the test ( P < .0001 and P = .0036, respectively), and film‐restraint stress mice also exhibited longer distances traveled than control mice in the first block, although the result failed to reach significance after Bonferroni correction ( P = .0306).
Meanwhile, there was a significant trial n -1 x trial n interaction, F (1,12) = 11.16, p = .006, ƞ p 2 = 0.48, although the shorter time in trial n with an obstacle following trial n -1 with no obstacle ( marginal M = 830 ms, SE = 57) compared to obstacle ( marginal M = 888 ms, SE = 66) failed to reach significance ( p =.032, Holm-Bonferroni corrected alpha level = 0.025).
failed to reach significanceP = 0.03650.7× alpha
Post hoc analysis revealed that 17‐ and 23‐month‐old mice spent a longer time in contact with the unfamiliar conspecific of the same age than 2‐month‐old mice, although the behavioral differences among the age groups failed to reach significance after the Bonferroni correction (17 and 23 mo > 2 mo, P = 0.0365 and P = 0.0314, respectively).
failed to reach significancep = 0.0410.8× alpha
Changes in JOA and SF-36 failed to reach significance between two groups, while preoperative NDI in the high SCA category was larger than the low SCA category (23.33 ± 5.70 vs 19.32 ± 4.92, p = 0.041). △NDI (pre vs post) and △NDI (pre vs F/U) in the high SCA group exceeded than that in the low SCA group (pre vs post: p = 0.018, pre vs F/U: p = 0.048) (Table 3 ).
nominally significantP = .0470.9× alphagold
failed to reach significanceP = .071.4× alphaplainly factual
The association between rs2075650 and AD was nominally significant among ε4 homozygotes (model 4) (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.00-1.77; P = .047) but failed to reach significance after APOE adjustment (model 2; OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.99-1.19; P = .07) or among ε3 homozygotes (model 3; OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.98-1.38; P = .09).
failed to reach significancep < 0.051.0× alpha
We interpreted this positive relationship that trended toward significance to be indicative that the two novel objects were eliciting similar responses from the penguins, but acknowledged that the relationship failed to reach significance at the traditional p < 0.05 level, which we consider in our interpretation of the results below.