“failed to reach significance”

The most common SNP among the causal SNPs was C4S1878 (MAF = 0.16), also in the KDR gene, but it failed to reach significance (−log( P ) = 4.44).

This voxel reached a slightly higher statistical value for the DfMRI analysis than the BOLD results, although it too failed to reach significance at a corrected level, z = 4.04, P < 0.0005 uncorrected.

For the Hammer dataset, three approaches failed to reach significance, but the Contours Mass-MV approach produced a very low p value ( p < 0.001).

A similar tendency was observed for the low dose of MK801; this effect failed to reach significance when all the experimental conditions were included, but when compared only to the control group, the difference was significant (p<0.001, Mann-Whitney test, not shown on the graph).

According to the Spearman rank correlation test, co-expression of mammaglobin A and lipophilin B was highly significant in breast, uterine and ovarian tissues (each p < 0.001) but failed to reach significance in cervical tissues due to the small sample size (n = 2).

Post hoc ANOVAs in each block order condition revealed that approach bias was highly significant in participants completing the compatible block first ( F (1, 14) = 29.30, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.59), but failed to reach significance in participants completing the compatible block second ( F (1, 14) = 0.07, p < 0.795, η 2 p = 0.001).

In the patient group, we observed a trend towards smaller volumes of the right inferior frontal gyrus (x=55,y=20, z=15, k=562, t=4.42, p=.25 and x=46,y=9, z=32, k=624, t=4.41, p=.23 ), of the left occipital lobe (x=-39,y=-90, z=6, k=964, t=4.35, p=.14), and of the left postcentral gyrus (x=-64,y=10, z=-32, k=573, t=4.06, p=.25), but these differences failed to reach significance, even at the liberal threshold (p<.001 uncorrected).

In the left DLPFC/FEF, a similar pattern was observed, even if it failed to reach significance at corrected levels (interaction, x , y , z : −34, −4, 54, F 1,58 = 19.05, p <0.001; simple effect in spontaneous participants, x , y , z : −36, −2, 54, t = −4.55, p <0.001; in instructed participants, x , y , z : −40, −12, 54, t = 2.65, p = 0.007, all significance levels uncorrected).

Although, the large differences between relaxin stimulation and vehicle, both for mRNA and peptide expression in this experiment, failed to reach significance due to apparent non-responder mice, the significant correlation ( p < 0.001) between peptide and mRNA expression strongly implies that the variance in this model is not of a technical nature, but is due to the biological variability in mouse responsiveness.

While the increase in the AMPKβ1 isoform alone failed to reach significance, we observed an increase in its activated form, p‐AMPKβ1 (Ser108) (64.5%; P =0.0013; Figure 3A ) in cKO animals.

There was a trend towards a greater number of rare homoplasmic point mutations in two genes in AD compared to controls; MT-RNR1 (AD; 30/282 (10.6%), Controls; 16/344 (4.7%)) ( p = 0.005)) and again MT-TR (AD; 6/282 (2.1%), Controls; 0/344) ( p = 0.008), although both failed to reach significance at the corrected threshold of p = 0.0014.

By contrast, gender was not significantly associated with Cluster 1, χ 2 (1) = 5.58, p = .02, and failed to reach significance for Cluster 3, χ 2 (1) = 9.41, p = .002.

In the late cluster, we observed effects in similar directions: While enhanced negative compared to neutral brain activity following rDLPFC inhibition failed to reach significance, negative images elicited reduced amplitudes from Pre-cTBS to Post-cTBS in the Active Control condition [ F (1,36) = 13.595, p = 0.002].

For cooperation streaks, 16 Hz Sync significantly differed from the control ( P = 2 × 10 −3 , corrected), while 16 Hz Rand failed to reach significance ( P = 4.4 × 10 −3 , corrected).

Although this tendency was numerically more pronounced in the violent group, the BLOCK x GROUP interaction failed to reach significance (ANOVA based on percentage of punishment selection 8; BLOCK F(1,18) = 10.2, p<.005, η 2 = .33; BLOCK x GROUP: F(1,18) = 2.4; p<.14, η 2 = .08; GROUP n.s.).

These effects failed to reach significance at the p < 0.005 level.

Although methylation at CpG site cg19859270 of GPR15 failed to reach significance, the gene expression signal for GPR15 correlated negatively with RTE% ( P = 0.0068, r 2 = 0.0803) ( Figure 6H ) and was elevated in smokers ( Figure 6I ).

Additionally, stress exposure and food access interacted to influence L-DOPA concentrations [ F (1,31) = 4.22, p = 0.0485], however, post hoc analyses failed to reach significance. 3.2.4 Cecal contents Stressed rats had elevated levels of 5-HIAA/5-HT [ F (1,31) = 7.83, p = 0.0088], which was likely a result of increased 5-HIAA concentration [ F (1,31) = 4.70, p = 0.0380] compared to unstressed rats ( Figure 4A ).

In the B6JJcl group, lactating females showed a lower percentage of sucrose preference than nulliparous and nonlactating females, although the differences failed to reach significance after Bonferroni correction ( p = 0.0088 and p = 0.0228, respectively).

The correlation between the residualized change scores of psychological flexibility and quality of life in the environment dimension failed to reach significance in the pre-treatment to post-treatment comparison ( p = .009) but was significant in the pre-treatment to follow-up-comparison.

The lipid profiles varied among the three groups, although these differences failed to reach significance, with the exception of LDL-cholesterol, which was significantly higher in the unstable angina patients than in the control subjects ( p = 0.009).

Un-labelled pairwise comparisons failed to reach significance of P = 0.01 and were considered to be insignificant.

However, changes in Abilities failed to reach significance ( t 76 = 2.44, p = 0.01).

01; however, its relation with other variables of the study failed to reach significance level. ‘Who decided’ was positively correlated with migration history, r (680) = 0.110, P < .01 and negatively with proactive coping, r (682) = .-0.078, P < .05.

Although, the main effect of group [ F (1,47) = 3.35; p = 0.074] and the interaction between time and group [ F (2,94) = 1.76; p = 0.178] failed to reach significance, separate post hoc analysis showed a significant increase regarding confidence only in the BS group from T1 to T3 ( p < 0.01).