“extremely significant”

These differences are extremely significant ( P < 0.01), and they show that MA and FM have advantages in pyrimidine research.

The miRNAs with significant difference (0.01 < p < 0.05), or extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01) between HA and SL groups, were referred to as HAH-associated miRNAs. 2.6.

However, the quadratic effect ( X 1 2 , X 2 2 , X 3 2 ) was found to produce extremely significant ( p < 0.01) positive effect on both Y 1 and Y 2 , but X 4 2 was only significant for Y 2 .

Especially, there were extremely significant correlations ( P < 0.01) between TKW and KL or KW in three environments, and the correlation coefficients ranged from 0.38 to 0.76 (Table 2 ).

In all analyses, differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05 and extremely significant when p < 0.01.

For the in-row plant spacing (plant density), the yield effect was extremely significant ( P<0.01 ) at three sites (except the LS site).

The relationship between pelagic and demersal fish of OFX concentration was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

In figures, * indicate significant difference ( p < 0.05) while ** indicates extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01). 3.

minima was the largest, at 6.1333 and 18.2966, respectively, and the difference was extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

At 2 h post-infection, the virulence of the deletion strain ∆ preA in EPC cells was 1.3-fold higher than that of the parent strain; the difference between the two strains was extremely significant ( p < 0.01). 2.6.

A Duncan’s multiple-range test was employed to compare the control and other treatment groups; a significant difference was observed when p < 0.05 and present with *, and an extremely significant difference was observed when p < 0.01 present with **.

Two benzothiophene and L-(+)-valine, ethyl mercury ions were extremely significant positive correlation ( P < 0.01), aminomethyl phosphonic acid and ethyl mercury ions were significantly negative correlation ( P < 0.05), sucrose and 6-hydroxy-1,2-adipic acid dioctyl ester, misha ossification alcohol, 2-ammonia-4-oxygen generation butyrate were extremely significant positive correlation ( P < 0.01), and (3R, 4S, 9R, 11R)-27-(4-hydroxy phenyl)-4-methyl-3,9,11-seven alkoxy three alcohol has significant negative correlation ( P < 0.05; Tables 2 – 4 ).

The circles in the figure represented the GO classification in which the differential proteins are located, with red representing extremely significant DEPs ( p value ≤ 0.01), yellow representing significant differential proteins ( p value ≤ 0.05), and blue representing non-significant enrichment.

Data in all the bioassays were evaluated by Student's t-test at a univariate level, p-value<0.05 or p-value<0.01 were respectively regarded as significant differences or extremely significant differences. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 as compared to control sample.

However, it was extremely significant lower in d4 than other times d4 (p<0.01), Brevundimonas and Psychrobacterium were extremely noteworthy significant higher in d0 than d4, d6, and d7 (p<0.01).

An independent t -test was performed to indicate significant differences between two treatments (significant difference: *, p < 0.05; extremely significant difference: **, p < 0.01).

In this study, an extremely significant difference was declared for p<0.01, and a significant difference for p<0.05, with p<0.10 being considered a tendency.

5 , all key taste metabolites exhibited extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) between cultivars, which was similar to the metabolomics results.

The statistics were considered significant when P < 0.05, and extremely significant when P < 0.01.

The ANOVA results showed extremely significant differences (P<0.01) between the genotypes of this population, and also significant differences between the various environments.

The β-diversity of gut microbiota showed extremely significant independent distribution between AG and BC (Anosim p < 0.01).

Data are represented as the mean ± SD of triplicate independent experiments and statistically extremely significant differences compared with the negative control (** P < 0.01).

Among them, the protein levels of TLR4 and MyD88 in the Bilo+Ly group were extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

We examined a total of 60 cows, including subclinical laminitis, chronic laminitis and healthy without any symptoms with 20 animals in each group. Inflammatory mediators Compared with healthy cows, HIS, IL-6, LPS, and TNF-α in subclinical laminitis group significantly increased ( P < 0.05), extremely significant increased HIS, LPS, TNF-α ( P < 0.01) as shown in (Figs. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ); compared with healthy cows, COX-2, HIS, IL-6, LPS, and TNF-α in chronic laminitis cows were significantly increased ( P < 0.05), extremely significant increased COX-2, HIS, TNF-α ( P < 0.01) as shown in (Figs. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ).

2014 ), bacterial or fungal genera with extremely significant ( P < 0.01), strong correlations (Spearman’s correlation, r > 0.7) with other bacterial or fungal genera were selected (Xia et al. 2020 ).