“extremely significant”

The difference was considered to be significant when p was <0.05, and the difference was considered to be extremely significant when p was <0.01 ( ## p < 0.01 is vs. the control group; * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 are vs. model group).

From both mRNA and protein levels, the results confirmed an extremely significant increase in the expression level of S100A9 after transfection with pc- S100A9 compared with the pcDNA3.1 ( P < 0.01).

The results indicate an extremely significant difference in body size between the large and small pig populations in this study ( P < 0.01, P < 0.001).

When there were significant differences ( p < 0.05), and there were extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01), the group means were further compared using Duncan’s multiple range test, and the results are presented in a histogram prepared in GraphPad Prism 6.0. 3.

Our findings showed that genetic variations among the 44 genotypes were extremely significant ( P < 0.01) for all characteristics, demonstrating the existence of considerable genetic variation among all genotypes; thus, additional subsequent research was carried out to evaluate the combining ability [ 31 , 41 – 49 ].

The production of yellow pigment in Δ mokE was significantly higher ( p < 0.01) than that of MS-1, while the yellow pigment of PgpdA-mokE was extremely significant lower ( p < 0.01) than that of MS-1, and the content of red pigment was also significant ( p < 0.05) lower than that of MS-1 on the 3rd, 9th, and 11th days ( Figure 12 ).

Compared with the controls, the fish in Ll:pSLC-G group had a significantly lower viral load on the 1st day post-challenge ( p < 0.05), and extremely significant difference was detected on the 3rd day ( p < 0.01).

In comparison with the model group, a concentration-dependent increase in thymic and splenic indices was observed in LH-6-treated immunosuppressed mice, and the thymus and spleen indices of the 200 mg/kg LH-6 group were extremely significant ( p < 0.01), demonstrating that LH-6 has a certain repairing effect on CTX-induced damage to immune organs. 3.2.

The difference of plant heights was extremely significant as compared to wild type ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 8-1 ).

It was interesting that 11 among the rest 13 genes presenting extremely significant overexpressed pattern in liver cancers as compared to that in the adjacent liver tissues (P<0.01; Table IV ; Fig. 13A-K ), such as CACNA1E, HTR4, CACNA1C, CHRM3, OXTR, CACNA1I, CACNA1A, CHRFAM7A, PTGER3, TACR1, CAMK2A.

In regional grouping, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed that there was an extremely significant difference in Shannon indices between the groups JN and WH ( P < 0.01) and a significant difference between the groups LY and WH ( P < 0.05).

The results showed that, synthesis score can be influenced by lysozyme and SO 2 concentrations on an extremely significant level ( P < 0.01).

At 80°C, an extremely significant difference (p<0.01) was observed between the activities of the CT-LIP (65.80%) and UC-LIP (32.30%) group.

T-test also revealed significant effect of yearly difference on AREV (0.01 < P < 0.05) under no-till, and that was extremely significant (P < 0.01) under rotary tilled condition (Table 2 ).

In different river basins, there was a significant correlation between the composition of methanogenic communities in the Yellow River basin and spH ( r = 0.28, p < 0.05), while in the Huangshui River basin, there was an extremely significant correlation with spH ( r = 0.43, p < 0.01).

The difference was considered to be extremely significant when p < 0.01.

Under the condition of 20 °C, an extremely significant decrease in GYM-A concentration occurred at pH 5 and 7 after 8 months ( p < 0.01), of which 14.8 ± 3.7% decreased ( p < 0.05) within the first two-month period and 81.8 ± 9.3% decreased ( p < 0.01) after 8 months at pH 7, while it showed no obvious decline under the treatment of pH 3 ( p > 0.05).

According to a chi-square test of the 6452 markers, there were 525 markers showing segregation distortion ( P < 0.05) even though the extremely significant SNPs ( P < 0.01) were excluded anteriorly, and the total segregation distortion ratio was 8.14%.

Data comparison employed one-way analysis of variance test, with subsequent Dunnett’s multiple comparison test and significant difference was inferred for p<0.05 and extremely significant difference p<0.01.

P values of p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001 were considered extremely significant (**** or ***), p < 0.01 very significant (**) and p < 0.05 significant (*).

There were extremely significant correlations at p < 0.01 between pH and Pb (r = −0.90), and between EC and Cd (r = −0.84).

Western blotting revealed that the upregulation of miR-29b-3p inhibited YWHAE expression, resulting in a very significant decrease in the ratio of p-BAD/BAD and full-length caspase 3/cleaved caspase 3 (P<0.01) and an extremely significant increase in the ratio of BAX/BCL-2 (P<0.01).

It was extremely significant ( P < 0.01) for the activity of lipase in the liver, foregut and midgut, and for the activities of amylase and trypsin in the hindgut.

As shown in Figure 3 A,B, compared with the control group, the expression of ovarian FSHR in the Mel group was significantly increased ( p < 0.05), extremely significant increase in FSH group and FSH+Mel group ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 3 A,B).

The migration differences between 12h and 24h for these two groups are significant (P<0.05) and between 48h and 72h are extremely significant (P<0.01).