Barely Significant
← all phrases

“extremely significant”

7,788 sentences · 7,788 papers · 14,688 search hits before verification

In the literature

extremely significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
This study screened microorganisms and metabolites with a correlation C value of greater than 0.99 and a CCP < 0.01 and found that Christensenellaceae_R-7_group , Ruminiclostridium_9 , Zoogloea , and the metabolites avocadene 2-acetate, lysyl-asparagine, gamma-glutamyl cysteinylserine, and biocytin have extremely significant and strong correlations ( P < 0.01).
extremely significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
SNCG and ARNTL were common in both differentially expressed genes in females and males at four-week-old, and the expression difference between the fast-growth and slow-growth groups was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), while there were no common differentially expressed genes in the eight-week-old males and females.
extremely significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
The results showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01) in egg number at 300 days, average egg production rate at 300 days (Fig. 1 and Table 1 ) and significant differences ( P < 0.05) in age at first egg and the number of hierarchical follicles between LEP and HEP groups.
extremely significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
The experimental variables were associated with the following formula: Yields = 4.68 + 0.23 A + 0.12 B + 0.63 C − 0.025 AB − 0.15 AC − 0.13 BC − 0.18 A 2 − 0.47 B 2 − 1.33 C 2 The variance analysis demonstrated that coefficients A , B , C , AC , BC , A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 were extremely significant ( p < 0.01), whereas the interaction effects of AB showed no significant difference on cCPP yields, which indicates that the variables A , B , C , AC , BC , A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 could significantly influence the extraction yields of cCPPs.
extremely significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
Results Characterization of physicochemical properties of different species of litter There were extremely significant differences in Dw ( p < 0.01, F = 3296.941), total C ( p < 0.01, F = 20.538), total P ( p < 0.05, F = 7.668), C/N ( p < 0.01, F = 68.247), N/P ( p < 0.01, F = 21.415), and C/P ( p < 0.01, F = 26.931) among the three types of leaf litter, but there was no significant difference in the content of total N ( p > 0.05, F = 4.355), as shown in Table 1 .
extremely significantP < .010.2× alphaqualified
Further assessment determined that the scores of both experimental groups were significantly lower than that of the control group, and that the difference between the integrated practical training experimental group and the control group was extremely significant ( P < .01), while the difference between the training group and purely theoretical group approached the threshold of significance ( P = .051).