“extremely significant”

In this study, we further verified that the correlation relationship between HSEs and up-regulated genes was extremely significant (Fisher’s exact test, ∗∗ p < 0.01), which suggested that HSFs could upregulate HSP20 genes for African bermudagrass to cope with high temperature.

* represented significant difference ( p < 0.05); ** represented extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01); # represented significant difference ( p < 0.05); and ## represented extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01). 3.

As shown in Figure 4 , an extremely significant correlation was found between TBARS and AV ( p < .01) in hot‐drying conditions and had a strong correlation under sun‐drying ( p > .05).

ABTS and the reducing power showed extremely significant positive correlations ( p < 0.01) with the TPC, TFC, total acid, and volatile acid.

Among the three designed siRNAs, siRNA2 had the most significant inhibitory effect on the expression of the BMP2 gene, and the difference was extremely significant compared with the control group ( P< 0.01).

This study screened microorganisms and metabolites with a correlation C value of greater than 0.99 and a CCP < 0.01 and found that Christensenellaceae_R-7_group , Ruminiclostridium_9 , Zoogloea , and the metabolites avocadene 2-acetate, lysyl-asparagine, gamma-glutamyl cysteinylserine, and biocytin have extremely significant and strong correlations ( P < 0.01).

Unless otherwise stated, the differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05, or extremely significant when p < 0.01.

The duration of the RSF (or the ecological restoration duration), vertical soil depth, and horizontal distance from the outcrops had extremely significant effects on the soil particle size distribution parameters ( p < 0.01); however, the interactions among these factors indicated significant differences ( p < 0.05).

Following the analysis, the outcomes of thirteen groups were displayed in Tables S2 and S3 , along with the equation for the quadratic polynomial regression between the LC and two factors: LC = +39.52 + 1.14∗A+2.38∗B+3.57∗C-0.3375∗AB-0.7375∗AC+1.74∗BC-6.71∗A 2 -1.91∗B 2 -0.9644∗C 2 The quadratic polynomial regression equation between the EE and the two factors was: EE = +85.85 + 1.78∗A+5.07∗B+3.98∗C-2.65∗AB+0.45∗AC+5.03∗BC-17.92∗A 2 -1.57∗B 2 +2.38∗C 2 While the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05), the differences between the various treatments of the EE and LC models were extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

Selection in CSWG breed For CSWG, selected candidate genes were significantly enriched in 44 GO terms ( P < 0.05), and among which, 12 terms were extremely significant ( P < 0.01) (Figure S 3 ).

** indicates extremely significant difference compared with the control group ( p < 0. 01). * indicates significant difference compared with the control group ( p < 0.05).

p values of p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001 were considered extremely significant (**** or ***), p < 0.01 very significant (**), and p < 0.05 significant (*).

Secondly, SRL, SRA, RTD, and FP exhibited an extremely significant response to the interaction of N addition treatment and diameter classes ( p < 0.01).

NO 3 - -N was notably correlated with bacterial community diversity (Shannon and Simpson indexes), with NO 3 - -N and the Simpson index showing an extremely significant positive correlation ( r = 0.656, P < 0.01).

The result was judged as a higher or extremely significant difference at p < 0.01 and p < 0.001. 3.

An extremely significant difference exists between COS I at the middle concentration and the model group ( P < 0.01) and between the COS I, the COS II and the model groups.

Permanova analysis of clone groups (including clone 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) based on SNP distance showed that there were extremely significant differences among different clone groups (P < 0.01), which indicated that the classification is correct.

The protein expression of Bax experienced an extremely significant decrease after GAOS and MAOS intervention ( p < 0.01).

Except for Groups II and III, and II and IV, the LRT values among other groups reached extremely significant levels ( p < 0.01), which indicated that plant GRF protein had sites that underwent Type I functional divergence during the evolutionary process.

Besides, the difference level is considered extremely significant when P < 0.01.

The results showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01) in egg number at 300 days, average egg production rate at 300 days (Fig. 1 and Table 1 ) and significant differences ( P < 0.05) in age at first egg and the number of hierarchical follicles between LEP and HEP groups.

An extremely significant negative correlation was observed between TN and SO 4 2− for overlying-water aeration (coefficient: − 0.88 ( P < 0.01)) and sediment-aerated river simulation (coefficient: − 0.86 ( P < 0.01)).

Statistical Analysis For experimental variables, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used with nitrogen treatment as a factor, and differences between the means were considered significant when p < 0.05 and extremely significant when p < 0.01.

The VH of the duodenal segment in the LPS + H-MPTA group exhibited an extremely significant increase ( p < 0.01); the VH/CD ratio also increased significantly ( p < 0.01).

In contrast, these factors are not significantly correlated to EL yield, although they exhibit an extremely significant correlation with EG yield ( p < 0.01).