“extremely significant”

The apoptosis rate in the serum-free group was significantly higher than that in the normal control group and the difference was extremely significant (P<0.001).

The significance test analysis of the regression equation showed that the model was extremely significant ( p < 0.001), and the missing items were not significant ( p = 0.159 > 0.05).

Differences were considered statistically significant at *indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05), **indicates a highly significant difference (p < 0.01), ***indicates an extremely significant difference (p < 0.001).

An extremely significant statistical difference ( P < 0.001) was obtained by comparing the length of pars plana between control eyes and myopic eyes.

Statistical analysis using Tukey’s test demonstrated that extremely significant growth inhibition occurred when Tb(III) concentrations exceeded 1.5 mM ( p < 0.001), showing a clear dose-dependent pattern.

The distribution of methylation levels in DMRs indicated that the average methylation level of the liver was 0.43 to 0.62 during the neonatal and lactation periods, 0.56 to 0.65 during the adulthood and lactation periods, and 0.49 to 0.60 during neonatal and adulthood periods, with extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001).

In this study, the TNF- α increase in Group 2 STZ-treated animals was extremely significant at a p < 0.001 level.

PWY-6606, PWY-5873 and PWY-5871 had significant differences ( p < 0.05), and the rest had extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 11 b). 4.

A P < 0.05 was established as statistically significant; significant: 0.01 < P < 0.05; very significant: 0.001 < P < 0.01, and extremely significant: P < 0.001.

Even though both formulations had the same type of time distribution (exponential), the distribution rate parameters differed in an extremely significant manner on the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test ( p < 0.001).

As there was an extremely significant negative relationship between soil silt content and soil sand content ( r = 0.998, p < 0.001; Figure S4 ), soil silt content was excluded in all data analyses.

Differences were considered not significant at P > 0.05, statistically significant at P < 0.05, very significant at P < 0.01, and extremely significant at P < 0.001.

Statistically significant ( p < 0.05), highly significant ( p < 0.01), and extremely significant ( p < 0.001) features are indicated with ( * ) , (**) , and (***) , respectively.

Among these 97 SNPs/InDels, 34 had extremely significant impacts on Rb1 contents ( p < 0.001).

Compared to the NK group, the CHMm+RNK group exhibited an extremely significant increase ( p < 0.001) in C-Caspase-3 and BAX protein levels, with reduced BCL-2 and BCL-XL levels ( p < 0.001).

Registered data represented the mean values and standard deviations (SD) of three experiments, considering three levels of significance ( ∗ meant significant P < 0.05, ∗∗ meant very significant P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ meant extremely significant P < 0.001).

Triglyceride level was also decreased at 100 and 150 mg/kg doses; which is extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

Consistently, there was an extremely significant increase in HbA1c% on comparing both T2DM+ATHR and T2DM-ATHR diabetic groups to the control group (P<0.001 and P<0.01 respectively).

The results showed a high correlation between the two methods in turbulence slope (TS) (P<0.001; r=0.84) and an extremely significant correlation in turbulence onset (TO) (P<0.001; r=0.99).

Results Data showed that values of all within-group measures of the dependent variables had extremely significant statistical differences ( p < 0.001) for both intervention groups.

A comparison of the magnitude of these decrements between the two groups revealed that the HWL group experienced a larger reduction in body weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, body fat percentage, body fat mass, free fat weight, body water, and skeletal muscle mass compared with the LWL group, with the differences being extremely significant ( p < 0.001).

The best effective group was a combination of curcumin 50 mg/kg with piperine 20 mg/kg which showed extremely significant ( P < 0.001) decrease and increase in ECG and serum biomarker level, respectively, and moderate significant ( P < 0.01) decrease in lipid profile, antioxidant levels, and histopathological score, compared to curcumin alone-treated group.

None of the blood biochemical parameters exhibited significant differences between the ZF0 and ZF1 groups compared with both the control groups ( Table S9 ). Only the cholesterol (CHOL) levels in the ZF1 group and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels demonstrated extremely significant differences compared with the DF1 group ( p < 0.001).

Boosting with VLPs resulted in increased antibody titers, with final antibody titers reaching extremely significant (p< 0.001) values over the negative control mice.

However, at 24 h after LPS challenge, the expression level of SpTLR2 in the liver was significantly increased ( p < 0.05), whereas the other three tissues were extremely significant up-regulated ( p < 0.001).