“extremely significant”

The EE of RJ-III@HACC-SLNs did not significantly decrease ( P > 0.05), that RJ-III@SLNs had an extremely significant decrease ( P < 0.001), during 3 h incubated in SGF.

MRT 0-∞ and t 1/2 of WEP-GU decreased and had a very significant difference ( P < 0.01) compared with Control, AUC 0-∞ decreased and had a extremely significant difference ( P < 0.001) compared with Control.

The significance test analysis of the regression equation showed that the model was extremely significant ( p < 0.001), and the missing items were not significant ( p = 0.159 > 0.05).

The drug released from nanoemulsion was extremely significant (p<0.001) in comparison to commercial capsules, having the same quantity of SYN ( Figure 8 ).

The differences in abundance among Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Chloroflexi, Gemmatimonadetes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Acidobacteria were extremely significant ( P < 0.001) at the phylum level ( Figure 2F ), while at the genus level, the abundance differences among Pseudomonas , Ralstonia , Lechevalieria , Rhodanobacter , Rhodococcus , Bacillus , and Flavobacterium were extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

The primary term B was extremely significant ( p < 0.001), while the primary term C was significant ( p < 0.05); however, the terms A and D were not significant.

For the bacteria, the interaction effect between biochar addition and time was extremely significant ( p < 0.001).

Differences were considered not significant at P > 0.05, statistically significant at P < 0.05, very significant at P < 0.01, and extremely significant at P < 0.001.

When p was < 0.01, events were considered highly significant, p < 0.001 indicated extremely significant events.

Even when this distribution is dropped to have 10,000 randomly selected comparisons from each condition, there is still an extremely significant difference of F (1,19,999) = 1,004.58, p < 0.001.

A positive and extremely significant correlation was found between PCT and CRP in all three groups (p < 0.001).

Even though both formulations had the same type of time distribution (exponential), the distribution rate parameters differed in an extremely significant manner on the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test ( p < 0.001).

As there was an extremely significant negative relationship between soil silt content and soil sand content ( r = 0.998, p < 0.001; Figure S4 ), soil silt content was excluded in all data analyses.

Consistently, there was an extremely significant increase in HbA1c% on comparing both T2DM+ATHR and T2DM-ATHR diabetic groups to the control group (P<0.001 and P<0.01 respectively).

The p-value obtained in the evaluated data was extremely significant (p<0.001) in all objective questions, validating the data used in this research ( Table 2 ; Figure 1 ).

As depicted in Figure 3 A,B, the effect of NEFA on the apoptosis rate of cells was dose-dependent, and it was extremely significant in comparison to the control group ( p < 0.001).

Triglyceride level was also decreased at 100 and 150 mg/kg doses; which is extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

The apoptosis rate in the serum-free group was significantly higher than that in the normal control group and the difference was extremely significant (P<0.001).

Differences were considered non-significant (ns) for p-values >0.05 (marked as “ns”), significant for p-values <0.05 (marked as *), highly significant for p-values <0.01 (marked as **) and extremely significant for p-values <0.001 (marked as ***), respectively.

The AMMI analysis showed that genotype, environment, and the GEI had extremely significant effects on Gardenia jasminoides crocin contents ( p < .001).

The results show an extremely significant difference in programming learning approach ( t = 4.268, p < 0.001) and programming learning attitude ( t = 5.618, p < 0.001).

Boosting with VLPs resulted in increased antibody titers, with final antibody titers reaching extremely significant (p< 0.001) values over the negative control mice.

A P value of <0.05 was marked as *; a P value of <0.01, which means extremely significant difference, was marked as **; a P value of <0.001, which means extremely significant difference, was marked as ***; and ns means non-significance.

Registered data represented the mean values and standard deviations (SDs) of three experiments (ns = not significant, p ≥ 0.05, ∗ = significant, p -value 0.01–0.05, ∗∗ = very significant, p -value 0.001–0.01, and ∗∗∗ = extremely significant, p < 0.001). 4.

In particular, cells grown on PDGF-BB- or FGF-2-coated matrices were characterized with an extremely significant ( p < 0.001) increase in the expression levels of PLAT, PLAU, PLAUR, and MMP14 genes.