“extremely significant”

The null hypothesis that there is no difference in removing the print supports before or after final curing is therefore refuted, with an extremely significant result ( p -value < 0.001).

The nonobese group showed extremely significant ( P <0.001) increase in GPx activity after 24 and 48 weeks both, while obese group showed significant ( P value<0.05) increase in GPx activity with insulin treatment only after 48 weeks.

As shown in Figure 2 B and C, the molecular contents of sCD4 and sCD8 in the DuCV group at 8 to 16 dpi were highly significant ( P < 0.01) lower than those in the PBS group, 24 to 32 dpi was extremely significant ( P < 0.001) lower than that in the PBS group, the content of sCD8 in the 8 dpi PBS group was highly significant ( P < 0.01) higher than that in the DuCV group, and 16 to 32 dpi was extremely significant ( P < 0.001) higher than that in the DuCV group.

It was further differentiated between extremely significant (***, p < 0.001), very significant (**, p = 0.001 to 0.01) and significant (*, p = 0.01 to 0.05) results.

In the patients grouped by hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease, we observed extremely significant differences in mean age ( p < 0.001).

On the other hand, extremely significant ( p < 0.001) and high R 2 values were recorded when evaluating the behaviour of DPPH • (0.9572), ABTS •+ (0.9376), and CUPRAC (0.9564).

We observed that high concentrations of α -KG could reduce the PBE rate, while 100 μ M α -KG could significantly decrease the PBE rate of oocytes (S-table 1 ), and 10 and 20 μ M α -KG could significantly increase the PBE rate of oocytes (S-table 1 ), and the difference in the 20 μ M group was extremely significant (Con vs. 20 μ M: 64.7% ± 1.20% vs. 76.83% ± 1.05%, P < 0.001) ( Figure 1(b) ). 3.2.

p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, very significant if 0.001 < p < 0.01 and extremely significant if p < 0.001.

Force data at increasing cell-cell contact times for both MB231 and MB435 cells were extremely significant (p< 0.001) by single factor ANOVA.

Statistics GraphPad (version 5) was used to calculate unpaired and paired p values: ***, extremely significant, p < 0.001; **, very significant, p = 0.001-0.01; *, significant, p = 0.01-0.05; and ns , p > 0.05.

Specifically, there are extremely significant statistical differences between widowed and non-widowed elders in children’s economic support ( p < 0.001), children’s sick care ( p < 0.001), and children’s emotional support ( p < 0.001), respectively.

Statistically, significant results were signified as p < 0.05, more significant as p < 0.01, and extremely significant as p < 0.001.

More ANOVA and t -tests were calculated, with extremely significant results— p < 0.001.

One-way analysis of variance is performed with Dunn’s Test following ranked–based ANOVA (Kruskal–Wallis one way analysis of variance on ranks) and Student–Newman–Keuls method, taking p < 0.05 as significant, p < 0.01 as highly significant and p < 0.001 as extremely significant and represented by an asterisk in the figures.

The results were interpreted as follows - Insignificant: P > 0.05, Significant: P < 0.05, Highly significant: P < 0.01, Extremely significant: P < 0.001 Observations A total of 33 patients with signs and symptoms of Amlapitta were registered.

Analysis of the correlation between the genetic distance and geographical distance of latitude, showed an extremely significant correlation and the fitting degree was relatively high (R 2 = 0.1867, P = 0.001, Fig. 3 ).

The results showed an extremely significant positive correlation between SAR and AbunR (Fig. 3a ; R 2 = 0.833, P < 0.001), suggesting that the population with higher ‘Space Accessibility’ would occupy more space at t 2 .

The EE of RJ-III@HACC-SLNs did not significantly decrease ( P > 0.05), that RJ-III@SLNs had an extremely significant decrease ( P < 0.001), during 3 h incubated in SGF.

The Het difference between the two groups was extremely significant ( p < 0.001), and their distribution intervals were completely nonoverlapping.

The apoptosis rate in the serum-free group was significantly higher than that in the normal control group and the difference was extremely significant (P<0.001).

Consistently, there was an extremely significant increase in HbA1c% on comparing both T2DM+ATHR and T2DM-ATHR diabetic groups to the control group (P<0.001 and P<0.01 respectively).

The differences in abundance among Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Chloroflexi, Gemmatimonadetes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Acidobacteria were extremely significant ( P < 0.001) at the phylum level ( Figure 2F ), while at the genus level, the abundance differences among Pseudomonas , Ralstonia , Lechevalieria , Rhodanobacter , Rhodococcus , Bacillus , and Flavobacterium were extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

The significance test analysis of the regression equation showed that the model was extremely significant ( p < 0.001), and the missing items were not significant ( p = 0.159 > 0.05).

Differences were considered not significant at P > 0.05, statistically significant at P < 0.05, very significant at P < 0.01, and extremely significant at P < 0.001.

Further, there was a very significant positive correlation among contents of TC and TN, Ca and Mg ( p < 0.001), and an extremely significant positive correlation between contents the Ca and Mg ( p < 0.001).