extremely significantqualified
P -values below 0.05 and 0.01 were considered statistically significant and extremely significant, respectively.
P -values below 0.05 and 0.01 were considered statistically significant and extremely significant, respectively.
The independent sample t -test of SPSS version 18.0 was used to test the differences between groups, and P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 were considered significant difference and extremely significant difference, respectively.
We observed that hypoxia-induced LTP is associated with a rapid, irreversible and statistically extremely significant shortening of evoked PSCs – the decrease in current decay time constants ( Figure 2D ; control 39.7 ± 2.6 ms; hypoxia 16.7 ± 2.0 ms; reoxygenation 16.4 ± 2.5 ms; t = 85.6, df = 296, p < 0.0001 – hypoxia compare to control; t = 103.2, df = 897, p < 0.0001 – reoxygenation compare to control).
Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was carried out using the nonparametric t test of GraphPad Prism 4.0 for Windows (p value <0.001– extremely significant, <0.01– very significant, <0.05– significant, >0.05– not significant).
The results of the regression coefficient difference analysis of the model are as follows: A (BSA) is extremely significant, C (PEG8000) is significant, and B (TRE) and D (D-mannitol) are not significant.
These differential proteases reached significant levels ( q < 0.05), with some at extremely significant levels ( q < 0.01).
It seems extremely significant to know the response of the body to toxins (including toxic metals) at small doses, which would enable effective protection against further adverse consequences or increase the effectiveness of therapies used.
For data that meet the normality, a p ‐value less than 0.05 indicates a statistically significant difference, which is represented by “*”; a p ‐value less than 0.01 indicates a significant statistical difference, represented by “**”; and a p ‐value less than 0.001 indicates an extremely significant statistical difference, represented by “***”.
Result: Total 72 patients were enrolled in the study, out of which 64 patients completed There was extremely significant results obtained in case of urine analysis of patients for infection, bacteriuria and haematuria, at the end of 6 months, value as compared to before treatment value the study, With the treatment with UNEX capsule, significant relief was observed in case of X ray KUB shows that renal calculi disappeared in 18 patients at the end of 6 months out of 32 patients, whereas USG of renal pelvis shows disappearance in 16 patients out of 32, which is extremely significant as compared to before treatment value where 32 patients showed presence of renal calculi.
P < 0.05 was considered significant, P < 0.01 and P < 0.001 were considered extremely significant.
Statistically, p < 0.05 represents a significant difference, and p < 0.01 indicates an extremely significant difference.
The antagonistic effect of strain D65 was the best, with a radius of only 22.22 mm, which shows an extremely significant difference compared to the control (32.50 mm). 3.5.
Extremely significant dose reductions with the Allura Clarity system were obtained for the organs closest to the center of the X-ray beam, like the heart (4.31 mGy) and lungs (4.11 mGy).
The main effect of stimulus condition was also extremely significant, F (3, 22) = 18.591, P 1 < 0.01, P 1 < 0.458, 95% CI = [0.26, 0.72], and significantly smaller at the response in the consistent condition ( M = 674.664, SE = 18.120) than at the response in the inconsistent condition ( M = 713.574, SE = 20.683).
The predictive statistical model was able to generate a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve with an area under the curve of 0.8734 which is considered to be extremely significant.
The F -value of the model was 83.35 and the p -value was less than 0.0001, which indicates that the regression model was extremely significant since the term is considered significant when the “ P -value” is less than 0.05. 27 Furthermore, A , B , C , D , AB , A 2 , B 2 , C 2 and D 2 were also seen as significant model terms.
When P < 0.001, the statistics were considered extremely significant (***).
An analysis of the relationship between each module and the OC phenotype revealed that MM.darkseagreen 4 ( p = 4e-07), MM.violet ( p = 2e-04), MM.darkred ( p = 0.01) and MM.floralwhite ( p = 0.04) presented extremely significant positive correlations with OC traits.
When a two-tailed p value was less than 0.05, the publication bias was extremely significant.
As we can see from the correlation network ( Figure 6D ) diagram, which shows that the abundance of Candida and Didymella have a simultaneous extremely significant negative correlation with the contents of 2- n -amylfuran, Benzaldehyde, Isovaleraldehyde, Phenylethanol, 2-phenylcrotonaldehyde, and Benzyl alcohol.
p < 0.05 indicated a significant difference between the two groups, and p < 0.01 indicated an extremely significant difference between the two groups.
When p < 0.05, the difference was significant, and p < 0.01, the difference was extremely significant.
Through metabolic pathway analysis, the differential metabolites were mapped, which reflected there were extremely significant differential metabolites in xylem and phloem [ 25 ].
Differences among the groups were assessed with one-way analysis of variance, p<0.05 was considered to be significant and p<0.01 was considered to be extremely significant.
Our observations were found to be statistically extremely significant (P-value 0.0001, Chi-square 34.96 with 1 d.f and P value 0.0007, Chi square 11.627 with 1 d.f).