“extremely significant”

junos rootstock selections, an extremely significant correlation of 0.74 between total sugar (TS) and total soluble solids (TSS).

Secondly, SNPs with the 0.01% highest F ST value and corrected p value < 0.05 were considered extremely significant SNPs.

The significance test of correlation coefficients showed that most of the correlations between these genes were extremely significant ( p < R 2 , Figure 5B ).

The reported effects of TrP spinal cord connections on dorsal horn neuronal neuroplastic alterations and their increased connectivity to a larger number of nociceptive neurons make this process extremely significant for musculoskeletal pain problems.

Screening potential helpful indicator predictand connections for model adjustment is an extremely significant stage being developed of SDSM.

The difference between the number of neutralized parasites for each essential oil in comparison with the control (acetone) was found to be extremely significant.

An unpaired two-tailed t-test revealed that the difference between the two conditions is statistically extremely significant (p: < 0.0001) and thus the complete data set produces consistent data.

P value of <0.05, which means that there is a significant difference, P value of <0.0001 was considered as extremely significant, which is indicated with ****.

Statistical analyses were performed using a t-test, and p < 0.05 and < 0.01 were considered significant and extremely significant differences, respectively. 4.7.

The p < 0.001 was considered to be an extremely significant difference.

When the concentration of Cur varied from 5.6 to 22.4 μg/mL, the cytotoxicity of Cur, SCCI and SCCL + L groups were extremely significant differences, indicating that the synergistic effect of chemotherapy, photothermal therapy and mitochondrial Ca 2+ overload could effectively kill 4T1 cells.

The main effects of Time ( F (1,28) = 19.43, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.41) and Emotion Regulation ( F (1,28) = 30.29, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.52) were extremely significant.

P value < 0.05, FDR < 0.01, and a fold change equal or greater than 2-fold were used as the screening cutoffs for determining extremely significant differential gene expression between two samples.

ANOVA performed on all 27 subjects indicated a significant difference in CRS-R scores among the groups, F(3, 23) = 337.76, p < 0.001, ηp 2 = 0.97, which indicates that group differences explain 97% of the variance in CRS-R scores, representing an extremely large effect size and reflecting extremely significant differences in consciousness level-related scores among groups. 3.2.

The cross action of tricalcium phosphate concentration and inorganic salt concentration had no significant effect on the soluble phosphorus content ( p > 0.05), which was extremely significant for the quadratic terms of the model.

All data were presented as mean ± SD and p < 0.05 , p < 0.01 were considered to be statistically significant and extremely significant, respectively. 3.

This extremely significant result (400 s.d.) demonstrates that SPs carry information that is highly correlated with that of ProSite motifs.

3 , the difference in the probability distribution of the two groups of samples prior to matching is extremely significant, and the overlap interval of the two groups of samples is narrow.

Given that the immediate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on world economic activity could reasonably be expected to lead to extremely significant reductions in cash flows for many companies—at least in the short-term—the dividend omissions and reductions noted in Section 2 above (almost all of which preceded reported losses) may be viewed as rational, survival-motivated “anticipatory strikes.” 4.

The significance level was set as p < 0.05 (significant) and p < 0.01 (extremely significant).

Moreover, the treatment method had an extremely significant effect on the IC 50 α-amylase value in quinoa sample extract, the IC 50 α-amylase and IC 50 α-glucosidase value in quinoa digestive, and the content of polyphenols in quinoa digestive ( p < 0.01).

In each subgroup, for P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, the differences were considered statistically significant, more significant, and extremely significant, respectively.

A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant and a value of P < 0.01 was considered extremely significant.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) uncovered extremely significant variation with respect to the three marker-genotypes of BnaA05–442 co-segregating with leaf shape phenotype in the BC 5 F 3 (1) and BC 5 F 3 (2) populations (Table 4 ).

Second, there was an extremely significant difference in age distribution between AMI patients and control samples; thus, we were unable to adjust for the potential confounding effect in the present study.