Based on the incidence, disease index, and fresh weight control effect, the 0.75% BP emulsifiable concentrate has extremely significant phytotoxicity on eight weeds, and from high to low, it is shown as A . retroflexus > L. holosteoides > T . arvense > G . spurium > M . verticillate > C . album > A. fatua > E. benth .
The MDA content demonstrated an extremely significant positive correlation with the daily weight gain of Hu sheep at 0–80 days old.
Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05; P < 0.01 was considered extremely significant.
Though dogs fed TA had an increase in COR, GC, and ACTH secretion, TA still had the potential to alleviate stress relative to an extremely significant elevation in the ST group.
22 In the model, a p -value <0.05 was considered to be significant, and a p -value <0.01 was considered to be extremely significant.
High levels of Ile (0.8 mM and 1.6 mM) promoted ɑ -amylase mRNA expression and the effect was extremely significant.
Test results of P < 0.05 were considered significant, and P < 0.01 were considered extremely significant.
p -values of less than 0.05 and 0.01 were considered significant and extremely significant differences, respectively. 3.
This figure is extremely significant, especially when compared with those obtained by other flagship products in Spain, such as citrus fruits, the exports of which amounted to 3.6 million reales. 45 Therefore, it is not surprising that Spanish documents of this period refer to the damage that was being done to the populations of leeches in the country.
The difference between the three curves was extremely significant; in fact, the value of p assigned by the log-rank test is equal to 0.0041.
* p -value < 0.05 was considered as a statistically significant and **** p -value < 0.0001 was considered as extremely significant.
Bar = 1 cm; black dots represent individual values; p values calculated by one–way ANOVA; p < 0.05 represents a significant difference; p < 0.01 represents the difference is extremely significant; ns represents no difference.
The results showed that there were a total of 31 metabolites with significant differences between captive and wild North China leopard, and 9 metabolites with extremely significant differences (Fig. 4 ).
A p -value of the one-way ANOVA test or Kruskal-Wallis test was considered as statistically significant when <0.05, very significant when < 0.01, and extremely significant when <0.001.
p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 indicated significant difference and extremely significant difference, respectively.
P < 0.05 indicated statistically significant differences, and P < 0.01 indicated statistically extremely significant differences.
Values of p < .05, 0.01, or 0.001 were considered statistically significant (*), highly significant (**), or extremely significant (***), respectively, and n.s. represents no significance.
However, their toxicities observed in clinical trials were extremely significant and in some cases even fatal with no approved algorithms for toxicity prediction being available to date.
P < 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 was set to be significant, highly significant, and extremely significant, respectively. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Characterization of miR-29b/AuNPs nano-delivery system Despite great potential, the full implementation of miRNA therapeutics in the clinic is hampered by inefficient intracellular delivery due to susceptibility to RNase degradation, inefficient membrane penetration, and poor tissue-specific localization [ 14 ].
The TCEVD algorithm offers an extremely significant speed-up compared to computing the matrix and running a “naïve” EVD algorithm on it (see Investigation of computational efficiency of the TCEVD in the DySCo framework ).
The early protective effects of rPfHep and BBR were extremely significant.
Interestingly, we observed an extremely significant increase of mean CD24 expression in IDH-mutant glioma of GSE16011 ; the mean z -scores of CD24 transcript in IDH-wildtype and IDH-mutant samples were −0.2425 and 0.4122, respectively ( p < 0.0001, 95% CI = 0.4011 to 0.9082), with a similar finding in TCGA-LGG: −0.2264 and 0.05148 ( p = 0.0021, 95% CI = 0.1017 to 0.4541) ( Fig. 2 A, B).
While comparing white blood cell and lymphocyte counts, extremely significant P values were obtained.
This result was extremely significant in the susceptible group, but not in the non-susceptible group, which may be because the symptoms of the non-susceptible group were not obvious.
The interaction is considered extremely significant.