extremely significantqualified
p -values of < 0.05 indicated significant differences, and those <0.01 and <0.001 indicated extremely significant differences. 5.
p -values of < 0.05 indicated significant differences, and those <0.01 and <0.001 indicated extremely significant differences. 5.
The difference was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnet’s t-test and Tukey’s test, and P < 0.05 was considered significant difference and P < 0.01 was considered extremely significant difference.
Except for TSS, the extremely significant differences on treatments were observed for all variables.
With regard to the Student ’s t-tests on the differences of DB indices between SSGA/MSGA and Triple-Link Algorithm, the differences of DB indices between SSGA and Triple-Link Algorithm were usually at significant levels while the differences between MSGA and Triple-Link Algorithm were always at extremely significant levels (Fig. 4A,B,C and D ).
If the results demonstrated here can be achieved at an even greater scale, the potential social and economic benefits will be extremely significant.
A p -value of lower than 0.05 is considered significant, lower than 0.01 is considered very significant, lower than 0.001 is considered highly significant, and lower than 0.0001 is considered extremely significant. 3.
For all analyses, values of p < 0.05 were considered significant, and values of p < 0.01 were considered extremely significant.
The variance effects of genotype (G), environment (E), and their interaction were extremely significant for all three traits (Table 1 ), and variance of the replicates within seasons for SPH and PHI was also significant.
From a canonical variate analysis (CVA), which maximizes the variance between predefined groups while minimizing the within-group variance, it becomes evident that the difference between rhizotron and plate shapes was extremely significant ( Figure 3 C).
The correlation coefficients of GC12 and GC3s in MAC genomes of nine ciliates ranged from 0.445 to 0.781, showing extremely significant positive correlation.
A review committee consisting of two pharmacists independently reviewed the pharmacist interventions on a six-point scale (extremely significant, very significant, significant, somewhat significant, no significance, adverse significance) according to the potential impact on patient care.
The differences in expression levels were found to be extremely significant, which is consistent with the expression pattern in the transcriptome data.
It would be extremely significant from a disease modelling standpoint to assess whether or not TTBK2 conditional mice exhibit similar pathological tau accumulation outside the cerebellum vis-à-vis SCA11. 4) The main concern is that the analyses are based exclusively on the general architecture of the cerebellum.
In many cases (such as in formatted files like PDB), whitespace is extremely significant (' CA ' is calcium whereas ' CA ' is a C-alpha).
An extremely significant positive correlation was found based on two genes encoding for EBV viral proteins.
The threshold of statistical difference assumes that p > 0.05 indicates that the difference is not significant; p < 0.05 indicates that the difference is significant; p < 0.01 indicates that the difference is extremely significant. 3.
In all statistical analyses, p < 0.05, 0.001 < p < 0.01, and p < 0.001 were considered significant, very significant, and extremely significant, respectively. 3.
An average SNP-index and Δ(SNP-index) of each position were calculated via 200 kb sliding window with 100 kb step, windows out of 95% and 99% confidence intervals of the Δ(SNP-index) were treated as significant and extremely significant windows respectively ( Abe et al., 2012 ).
The following conventions were used: significant, ∗ p < 0.05; very significant, ∗∗ p < 0.01; and extremely significant, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. 3.
Abstract With the development of portable EEG acquisition systems, the collected EEG has gradually changed from being multi-channel to few-channel or single-channel, thus the removal of single-channel EEG signal artifacts is extremely significant.
P < 0.01 was considered to be extremely significant.
By comparing the reported research results, the CPAM-Dia/SA-La gel composite is confirmed to have extremely significant adsorption advantages for dyes. 2.3.5.
Based on a confidence level of 0.05, the Mann-Kendall test results were divided into nine grades: extremely significant increase, significant increase, slight increase, insignificant increase, no change, insignificant decrease, slight decrease, significant decrease and extremely significant decrease.
The significance levels were set at p < 0.05 (significant) and p < 0.01 (extremely significant) relative to the LPS group. 3.
Statistical analysis The Tukey-Kramer test of the software package Graph Pad InStat v.3.06 (32 bit) was used to study the significance levels of the different assays, for which P < 0.05 (*) was taken to be significant and P < 0.001 (***) extremely significant.