“extremely significant”

This experiment demonstrated that there was a significant or extremely significant relationship among appearance quality, nutritive quality, cooking/eating quality, and pasting properties.

coli resulted in a significant increase in fluorescence intensity at 20 h, demonstrating an extremely significant difference compared with conditions lacking AsfR expression ( Figure 2(g) ).

The results showed that there was an extremely significant difference between the pre-test and post-test of creativity in the experimental group.

p < 0.05 (*) was considered significant, and p < 0.01 (**) was considered extremely significant. 3.

In addition, the characteristics of B x signals, the mean value, and the peak value of the average of B x had an extremely significant linear relationship with the applied fatigue stress during the stable stage of the fatigue test, which indicates that MMMT is a feasible method for fatigue stress evaluation and even residual fatigue life estimation for weldments in service. welded joint tension-compression fatigue test metal magne

* p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant; ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 were extremely significant; NSD, no significant difference.

P values of ≤ 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001 were considered statistically significant (∗), highly significant (∗∗), or extremely significant (∗∗∗), respectively.

Heparin is extremely significant in the treatment of COVID19 patients due to its properties, mainly its similarity to heparan sulphate, which appears in a respiratory tract, its interactions with SARS-CoV-2 S protein, leading to viral adhesion inhibiting to the cell membrane [ 82 ], and its anti-inflammatory effects.

paracasei , whereas the genes of cysteine and methionine metabolism ( P = 0.006) and lysine biosynthesis ( P = 0.004) showed the extremely significant difference in the group with mixed inoculation.

Of interest for this work was the extremely significant improvement of HPP-treated myosin solubility in organic salt groups of K2 and K3 (the relative increases of solubility were 263% and 425%, respectively), and furthermore, the HK3 showed a solubility similar to that of the control ( Figure 1 ).

Of the nine lead SNPs, four are not significant in the original HC study at the nominal level (α = 0.05) but extremely significant for BW and BL, indicating that the significant signals are likely to be driven solely by BL and/or BW instead by HC.

∗ P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and ∗∗ P < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 were considered extremely significant.

Our study showed that UV exposure may be an apparent “MN-inducer.” Although the increase in MN following 254 nm UV applications was extremely significant, the amount of MN caused by 365 nm UV treatment was also remarkable.

As shown in Table 3 , the F-value of the model was 13.31, and the p -value was 0.0023 (less than 0.01), which indicated that the selected regression model was extremely significant.

However, the difference between the tumor volume of combination treatment group and controls remains extremely significant.

The softening effect of water on specimens with low confining pressure was extremely significant, and the softening coefficient of uniaxial compressive strength was 63.1% (less than 75%), indicating poor softening resistance.

p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and p < 0.01 was extremely significant. 4.

For all analyses, p -values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant, while those less than 0.01 were considered extremely significant.

For two-tailed tests, a P-value of 0.05 was deemed statistically significant, while 0.001 was regarded extremely significant. 3.

Significance level was set at p < 0.05, and extremely significant level set at p < 0.001. 3.

As shown in Figures 5A–C , compared with the control group, DSS-treated colitis group exhibited extremely significant reduction of diversity (Shannon and Simpson), whereas there was no significant difference of microbial species richness (Chao) among the five groups.

In “D9320,” the expression levels at each time point were lower than those of the control, and the difference was extremely significant at 24 h and 48 h; the levels were 0.54- and 0.49-fold that of the control ( Figure 4B ).

For all multiple comparison analyses (microbial community relative abundance, functional potential, chemical components, sensory scores), the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction was used for multiple testing correction, with the corrected p < 0.05 as the threshold for significant difference and p < 0.01 as the threshold for extremely significant difference; Cohen’s d effect size was calculated to evaluate the magnitude of the treatment effect, with Cohen’s d > 0.8 defined as a large effect size.

Dielectric Investigating the effect of magnetic field modulation on the dielectric properties of PVDF polymers is extremely significant.

P < 0.001 was considered to be of extremely significant statistical significance. 3.