“extremely significant”

In the 4-arm variation ( Figure 1M ), the group effect was very significant [ F (2,230) = 5.822, p = 0.0034] and the trial # effect was extremely significant [ F (9,230) = 3.552, p = 0.0004].

Comparison of slopes was performed via a two-tailed t test, which determined the difference generated was extremely significant ( p = 0.0004).

More than 83% of lecture-based teaching group has started chest compression as compared 96% of workshop group but only 49% of the participants of lecture-based group performed quality chest compression as compared to 82% of other group, and the difference is extremely significant ( P = 0.0005).

Furthermore, the extremely significant lower value of the Shannoneven and Simpsoneven indices ( p ≤ 0.0005) in OVA-allergic mice demonstrated the considerably lower community evenness in feces of allergic mice.

Four groups had extremely significant differences in personality of Reasoning ( F = 18.852, P < 0.0005), Apprehension ( F = 21.856, P < 0.0005), and Sensitivity ( F = 7.092, P < 0.001).

The overlap was extremely significant ( p < 0.0005, hypergeometric test) and included 9 HSA21 genes.

Differences were considered significant with a P-value below 0.05 (p < 0.05, *), highly significant (p ≤ 0.005, **) and extremely significant (p ≤ 0.0005, ***).

The level of significance adopted for all the tests was as follows: not statistically significant p > 0.05; significant p < 0.05; very significant p < 0.005; and extremely significant p < 0.0005.

divergens ( P = 0.002), and extremely significant for C. maltaromaticum and L. gelidum subsp. gasicomitatum ( P = 0.0005; P = 0.0005), respectively.

The pooled meta-analysis confirmed that the mRNA upregulation of ZG16B was extremely significant in breast cancer ( p = 5.97 × 10 −4 ) ( Figure 3 ).

Among them, extremely significant differences were present in the body weight traits in adult SWCG ( p = 0.0006).

At day 14, compared to untreated group the two-tailed p values of 46F2SIP and L19-IL2 groups were very significant ( p = 0.0041, p = 0.0047) and for 46F2SIP/L19-IL2 group were extremely significant ( p = 0.0006), indicating the strong efficacy of combined therapy.

Comparison of data shown that there is an extremely significant association (P = 0.0006, 95% confidence interval = 0.01628 to 0.4011, power of the study: 92.2%) between infection status of mother and acquiring of infection by the children born to them.

Further analyses revealed an extremely significant association between HBsAg and/or anti-HBc seropositivity and the number of blood transfusions ( P = 0.0006) and units ( P = 0.0002) that exclusively ranged up to fifty and sixty transfusions/units, respectively.

And an extremely significant association was found between rs7708392 and CRC risk in genotype model (C/G vs C/C OR=1.86, 95%CI=1.3-2.66, P =0.0007), dominant model (C/G-G/G vs C/C OR=1.82 95%CI=1.28-2.58, P =0.0008), and additive model (OR=1.58, 95%CI=1.17-2.13, P =0.003).

The PWV mean change in low-to-moderate-intensity trials was extremely significant ( P = 0.0007) with SMD of −0.32, 95% CI is −0.51 to −0.14, and low risk of heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0%).

A significant difference in reaction times was found between Byblis -1 (C&M) and Byblis -2 (C) (one-way analysis of variance, F(3.36) = 7.779, p = 0.0353206, Tukey HSD post-hoc testing); very significant differences were found between Byblis -1 (C) and Bybils -2 (C&M) (One-way Analysis of Variance, F(3,36) = 7.779, p = 0.0046993, Tukey HSD post-hoc testing); and extremely significant differences were found between Byblis -1 (C&M) and Byblis -2 (C&M) (One-way Analysis of Variance, F(3,36) = 7.779, p = 0.0007705, Tukey HSD post-hoc testing).

An extremely significant linkage was found with the HRBC subtype (p = 0.0008) and a notable relation with the TNBC (p = 0.0121) subtype.

However, both models were extremely significant for the predictors of the number of periapical bone lesions and the level of alveolar bone loss ( P = 0.0009 and P = 0.0001, respectively).

This observation was supported by the extremely significant quantitative difference in the H 2 O 2 production before and after passing the phase transition point: R = 0.7124, p < 0.0009 (n = 18) (Table 5 ).

There was no significant difference in FAK expression, but p-FAK expression showed an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.001).

In statistical analysis, both FST and TST exhibited an extremely significant ( p < 0.001) reduction of immobility time observed for MEPC (200 and 400 mg/kg) and standard drug fluoxetine against the control.

p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, very significant if 0.001 <p < 0.01 and extremely significant if p < 0.001.

Force data at increasing cell-cell contact times for both MB231 and MB435 cells were extremely significant (p< 0.001) by single factor ANOVA.

Statistical analysis was done using the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test or two-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction as appropriate and defined as significant (*, 0.01 < p < 0.05), very significant (**, 0.001 < p < 0.01), and extremely significant (***, p < 0.001).