“extremely significant”

P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and P < 0.01 was considered extremely significant.

A P value of *P<0.05 was considered statistically significant, **P<0.01 was considered very significant, ***P<0.001 was considered extremely significant.

There was an extremely significant difference in MYOD gene expression in the pectoral muscle (72.68 ± 10.34) and thigh muscle (75.20 ± 10.04) of males between WPR and the other three chicken breeds at D1 ( p < 0.01, Figure 3 A,B).

Correlation analysis between the environmental factors and endophytic fungi at the class level revealed that Sordariomycetes and Pucciniomycetes had extremely significant positive correlations with the total carbon, annual average precipitation, and annual average temperature, while Leotiomycetes showed an extremely significant negative correlation with quick acting potassium.

The results showed that the distribution of green fluorescence area and brightness between SR1 and other 4 mutant lines had extremely significant differences.

* P < 0.05 indicates a significant difference between the LPS(+) group and the LPS(-) group during the same period; ** P < 0.01 indicates an extremely significant difference between the LPS(+) group and the LPS(-) group during the same period.

It can be seen that the regression model P = 0.0006, indicating that the regression model reached an extremely significant level and that the equation determination coefficient R 2 = 0.9567, indicating that the equation showed a high degree of fit.

l-version no pmc-prop-is-scanned-article no pmc-prop-preprint no pmc-prop-in-epmc yes pmc-license-ref CC BY Background The development of biosensors for the diagnosis and monitoring of diseases, drug discovery, proteomics, and the environmental detection of pollutants and/or biological agents is an extremely significant problem.

Heatmap (Java Treeview 1.1.6) and Cluster 3.0 were used to analyse the correlation between proteins and genes expression, and p < 0.05 was considered statistical difference, p < 0.01 presented significant difference, and p < 0.001 presented extremely significant difference. 3.

* p < 0.05 was implied statistically significant, and ** p < 0.01 was considered extremely significant.

Among them, OsPTR9-3 was japonica -specific predominant haplotype, and extremely significant differences of root weight and R/S were detected between OsPTR9-3 and other two haplotypes in japonica with p value less than 1.0 × 10 −4 and 1.0 × 10 −6 , respectively (Fig. 6 B) .

96 One study showed that even though the overall pharmacist intervention rate was low (1.59%), just over 50% of these interventions were considered to be higher than clinically “significant”, including 11% of cases being “very significant” or “extremely significant”, producing an annual net cost benefit of $116,493. 97 This highlights that the presence of a pharmacist in a chemotherapy preparation unit can prevent ADEs in a high-risk environment and result in a noteworthy positive effect on hospital budgets.

The quantitative analysis showed an extremely significant increase of TUNEL-immunopositive cell density and OD comparing 4T1 animals to controls (0.63 ± 0.02 vs. 0.07 ± 0.01 and 0.06 ± 0.00 vs. 0.01 ± 0.00, for cell density and OD, respectively) ( Figure 2 , Panels (A,B)).

After considering the different phases of the epidemic, the influence of political relations in the first phase was not significant, whereas in the second phase, the influence was extremely significant, and the absolute value of the coefficient significantly increased.

Based on three different datasets and the x 2 tests with 6 degrees of freedom, the calculated P -values were extremely significant in all cases, suggesting that the base at the second codon position affected the synonymous codon choices.

A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple range tests was used to determine the statistical significance of differences in the concentration of the metabolite among groups, which was significant when the p values were less than 0.05 and extremely significant when the P values were less than 0.01. 3.

In addition, the authors state that the size of the particles is extremely significant; the additives in the form of nanoparticles have a much larger contact surface with bacteria, which promotes the oxidation of the outer cell membrane, thus increasing the biocidal effects [ 43 , 44 ].

Therefore, we assayed ERK1/2 activation and found that the level of p-ERK1/2 in granulosa cells was sharply reduced by 100 μg/mL fullerenol treatment for 0 min to 2 h, and an extremely significant difference was observed at the 5 and 10 min time points compared with control.

Furthermore, the statistical significance of the studied variables was classified as extremely significant, very significant, and significant when p -values were <0.001, <0.01, and < 0.05, respectively ( Supplementary Tables S3, S4 ).

The qRT-PCR results demonstrated that the expression levels of lignin biosynthesis genes including PtrPAL4 , PtrC4H1 , PtrC3H3 , Ptr4CL5 , PtrCCoAOMT3 , PtrCOMT2 , PtrCCR2 , PtrCAld5H2 , and PtrCAD1 , lignin polymerization genes including PtrLAC19 , PtrLAC21 , PtrLAC26 , and PtrLAC41 , and hemicellulose biosynthesis genes including PtrGT43A , PtrGT47C , and PtrGT8F , increased at extremely significant levels, while the expression levels of the cellulose biosynthesis genes such as PtrCESA4 , PtrCESA7 , and PtrCESA8 , had no obvious increases in PtrWOX13A transgenic lines compared with WT ( Figure 6A ).

* P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant; ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001 were extremely significant; and ns was considered no significant difference.

α = 0.05 was considered the test level, and p < 0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant, and p < 0.01 indicated that the difference was extremely significant.

A P value < 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference, a P value < 0.01 indicated a significant difference, and a P value < 0.001 indicated an extremely significant difference.

P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference, while P<0.01 was considered to indicate an extremely significant difference.

Differences at p < 0.05 or p < 0.01 were considered statistically significant or extremely significant. 3.