“extremely significant”

The simulation group showed an extremely significant (two-tailed p < 0.0001) improvement in their post-test scores when compared to their scores before the module was taught.

In particular, factor C was extremely significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating that the amount of PLA had the main effect on the particle size.

It is a nonparametric test that compares two unpaired sets of data significantly different when the p value is less than 0.05 (**** extremely significant P < 0.0001, *** extremely significant 0.0001 < P < 0.001, ** very significant 0.001 < P < 0.01, * significant 0.0.1 < P < 0.05 and ns not significant ≥ 0.05).

Statistical analysis was conducted, where the production levels of investigated phenolic compounds in rol A transgenic plants exhibited an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.0001) when compared to the wild type A. carvifolia plants ( Table 2 ). 3.5.

Nonparametric ANOVA was extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).

A two-way ANOVA analysis of the results revealed an extremely significant interaction between the extraction method and species of algae ( p < 0.0001).

Such increases became highly significant in P20 cells ( p < 0.001) and extremely significant and peaked in value in cells at P25 and P30 ( p < 0.0001) when compared to those for P5 cells.

The model is extremely significant ( p < 0.0001) following the data processing and analysis, suggesting that the multiple regression equation accurately fits the experimental data and is statistically significant.

Overall, the difference was extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).

The effects of the initial MC (A) and inlet air temperature (B) on the final MC were extremely significant ( P < 0.0001), that of feed rate (C) was generally significant, and that of inlet velocity (D) on deposition rate was not significant.

Comparison of the Puncture Depth Between the Ipsilateral Ventricle and the Contralateral Ventricle The difference in the puncture depth between the ipsilateral ventricle and the contralateral ventricle was extremely significant ( P < .0001); the depth of puncture to the ipsilateral ventricle in 373 patients was less than 60 mm, and the depth of puncture to the contralateral ventricle in 37 patients ranged from 52 to 65 mm (Figure 4 D).

Fisher's meta analysis indicated that the observed increase in those paired studies was extremely significant (meta p -value < 0.0001).

For both chromosome I and X , there was an extremely significant increase in the number of painted chromosomal segments between pre-meiotic nuclei and TZ-NF nuclei (p<0.0001), reflecting a substantial elongation of chromosome territories following meiotic entry.

From 6 DPI and beyond, P values were extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).

Subsequently, at post-intervention (TF3) and the fifth cycle (FF1), it decreased to 67.70 ± 22.37 and 70.51 ± 33.23, respectively, demonstrating a statistically extremely significant reduction from the baseline ( p < 0.0001).

The correlation was extremely significant for both analyses (P < 0.0001).

Statistically, there was an extremely significant increase ( p = 0.0001) in lesion scores in the cecal tissue of the CP group compared to the CN group.

Their differences were extremely significant for three OLL groups (each comparison pair, p = 0.0001).

The difference of serum RPTN levels between healthy controls and the patients was extremely significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 3-a ).

P values were represented as asterisks; p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant: 0.01–0.05, significant (*); 0.01–0.001, very significant (**); 0.001–0.0001, highly significant (***); p<0.0001, extremely significant (****).

Extremely significant differences ( p < 0.0001) were demonstrated by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test between the concentrations of 0–1.95 μg/mL ( Figure 4 A).

The differences between these slopes were extremely significant ( F = 368.13, P < 0.0001).

Kaplan–Meier survival analysis combined with the Log-Rank test confirmed an extremely significant difference between the two survival curves ( p < 0.0001).

The results showed that vB_AbaP_CV1 alone exhibited significantly stronger eradication efficacy than PB alone, and the combination treatment resulted in an extremely significant reduction in biofilm biomass compared to the untreated control (****P < 0.0001) ( Figure 5C ).

Inter-group and inter-frequency comparisons were extremely significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 2 C). 3.3 SRT shows influence with daytime hearing deprivation Contralateral recordings of the stapedial reflex threshold (SRT) were found in 90.13% of the patients.