“extremely significant”

“*” represents significant difference between the treatment group and control, and “**” represents extremely significant difference between the treatment group and control. 2.5.

Values were considered as significant (*) if they had a p value of 0.01 to 0.05, very significant (**) if they had a p value of 0.001 to 0.01, and extremely significant (***) if they had of p value 0.0001 to 0.001. 3.

The differences between groups were significant at p ≤ 0.05, the differences between groups were considered very significant at p ≤ 0.01, and the differences between groups were considered extremely significant at p ≤ 0.001. 3.

From the ANOVA table ( Table 4 ), it can be concluded that the significance level of glucose was all less than 0.05 with extremely significant differences.

The expression distribution of the three subtypes of characteristic gene scores in metastatic samples, primary samples and paracancerous samples were analyzed, and the three subtype characteristic gene scores showed extremely significant expression differences in different samples types ( Figure 3A ).

According to ANOVA, the following conclusions can be drawn: when p -value is less than or equal to 0.01, the corresponding design variable has an extremely significant effect on the response; when p -value is greater than 0.01 and less than or equal to 0.05, the corresponding design variable has a significant effect on the response; and, when p -value is greater than 0.05, the corresponding design variable has no significant effect on the response.

In this study, cervical proprioception deficit for all six cervical movements revealed a p-value <0.0001, which is considered extremely significant.

Therefore, developing effective therapeutic methods and repair strategies for SCI remains an extremely significant challenge faced by the global clinical community.

P-values < 0.05 or <0.01 were considered a statistically significant difference or extremely significant difference.

A P value < 0.05 (*) suggests statistical significance; P < 0.01 (**) suggests very significant differences; P < 0.001 (***) suggests extremely significant differences.

A P-value less than 0.05 was considered as significant and a P-value less than 0.01 was considered as extremely significant.

A p value <0.05 was considered significant difference, and p < 0.01 was considered to be an extremely significant difference between BA-treated mice and the control.

* ( p < 0.05) indicates a significant difference, ** ( p < 0.001), and *** ( p ≤ 0.001), which means a statistically extremely significant difference. 3.

P≤0.05 was considered significant, P≤0.01 was considered very significant and P≤0.001 was considered extremely significant at 95% confidence level.

We also searched for co-expressed genes between cell types exhibiting extremely significant correlations to validate the cell identities illustrated above.

Effect of N Form and Concentration on the Synchronization of Somatic Embryos The variance analysis results showed that the concentration of NH 4 + and the interaction between NH 4 + and NO 3 – had an extremely significant effect on SE, but the effect of the concentration of NO 3 – was not significant ( Table 2 ).

P values were determined, and P < 0.05 was considered significant (*), P < 0.01 very significant (**), and P < 0.001 extremely significant (***).

A p -value of *, # p <0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference, and **, ## p <0.01 was considered an extremely significant difference.

A p -value < 0.05 (*) was considered statistically significant, p < 0.01 (**) was considered very significant, and p < 0.001 (***) represented extremely significant values.

The p -values of <0.05 and <0.01 were regarded to be significant and extremely significant, respectively. 3.

Fourth, the magnitude of the effect, for most environmental exposure levels, may be relatively small but extremely significant for public health.

To encourage the use of wood as a material for joinery and other building components, the results of research into increasing the weathering resistance of wood are extremely significant.

It has been reported that the seed weight shows an extremely significant correlation with the seed size in rapeseed [ 2 ].

* P < 0.05 was considered significant, and ** P < 0.01 was considered extremely significant.

P<0.05 was considered statistically significant, and P<0.01 was considered extremely significant.