extremely significantqualified
The difference is extremely significant with the “at-risk” group survival curve always below the “not at-risk” curve (Log-rank test <0.0001).
The difference is extremely significant with the “at-risk” group survival curve always below the “not at-risk” curve (Log-rank test <0.0001).
The difference was significant when p < .05, and the difference was extremely significant when p < .01. 3.
That the children of London in the fifth year of the war should show improvement in nutrition instead of increased evi- dence of malnutrition is an extremely significant and encouraging fact.
Group comparisons were considered to be statistically non-significant (ns) if the calculated P -value was greater than 0.05, significant (*) with P = 0.01 to 0.05, very significant (**) with P = 0.001 to 0.01 and extremely significant (***) when the P -value was less than 0.001. 3.
Probabilities of P > 0.05 were considered non significant, P < 0.01 as very significant and P < 0.001 as extremely significant.
Reduction in the number of amoeba treated by different PI formulas compared to parasite control After 24 h of incubation, the PI chitosan nanoparticles gel demonstrated a 92% reduction in the number of viable amoebae, which was extremely significant when compared to the parasite control followed by PI gel, PI NLC Gel, PI LPs Gel, and commercial PI Eye drops (Table 5 ).
Acrimarine I, (+)-3-CARENE, (s)-homostachydrine and root length have extremely significant, significant positive, and negative correlations.
This illustrates an extremely significant improvement in CR% due to the advanced treatment process, which exhibits efficient performance in corrosion resistance with a mean enhancement of 86.59%.
p < 0.01 was considered extremely significant.
veronii C4 (pN-PA-2) showed extremely significant differences compared with those of wild type at 5, 10, 15% glucose and sucrose (Figure 6A ).
p < .05 and .01 was considered statistically significant and extremely significant, respectively. 3.
The differences between treatments for each assay were considered significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01. 3.
The impact of different pulverizing scales on the dietary fiber content and composition was extremely significant.
A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*), p < 0.01 very significant (**) and p < 0.001 extremely significant (***).
There is a significant or extremely significant positive correlation between the content of these substances and stem mechanical strength [ 19 ].
Eventhough this information is extremely significant, it is not commonly known because of lack of relevant studies in Nepal or the study area. 4.1.4.
Meanwhile, the TRAIL treatment induced an extremely significant increase in the mean fluorescence intensity of the cells compared with the control, indicating a high level of P17 uptake ( Figure 1c ).
According to the phenotypic comparison between two NILs, it was deduced that there was a QTL in the target region if the phenotypic difference was extremely significant by statistical test.
Values of p < 0.05 and 0.01 were considered statistically significant and extremely significant, respectively ( 33 ).
L1-induced raise in ALT and AST level are extremely significant compared to Ir1 treatment.
It is clear that all three curves display statistically extremely significant changes in their mean structure. 6 Conclusion This paper presents a novel framework for analyzing and evaluating the significance of time-varying alterations of topological patterns by leveraging the concept of fractal dimension.
P values are represented as follows: < 0.0001 (****, extremely significant), 0.0001 to 0.001 (***, extremely significant), 0.001 to 0.01 (**, very significant), 0.01 to 0.05 (*, significant), and ≥ 0.05 (ns, not significant).
Association of TaGW8-B1 alleles with agronomic traits in Chinese bread wheat cultivars Overview of coefficient correlation among different agronomic traits over three years in Chinese bread wheat cultivars (Supplementary Table S1 ) indicated that TKW showed extremely significant positive correlation with kernel width ( r = 0.69**) and kernel length ( r = 0.48**), and showed extremely significant negative correlation with kernel number per spike ( r = −0.36**) (Supplementary Table S1 ).
Considering the heterogeneity and homogeneity of tumorigenesis, it is extremely significant to explore and evaluate novel prognostic or therapeutic targets, which could function as a paradigm in the systematic management era.
Therefore, there was an extremely significant correlation between whether complicated with ACL injury in OA patients, and NWI-1, NWI-2, and NWI-A in different sequences.